RatherGoodBear said:
So is the minimum height requirement based more on whether the body will physically fit into whatever restraint system is on a particular ride, and not necessarily the elements of that ride?
BINGO! Perfect example... Superman RoS (at SFNE anyway) has a max and min height. The forces of the ride have zero to do with it. That height is to ensure:
A. Your butt stays in the seat
B. Your legs don't get cut off (i.e. Dèjá Vu)
bill, doesn't *think* they'd spend on a back spike for theming OR for some (unnecessary?) redundant safety device...could be wrong, but I'm hoping for a backwards PUSH up that spike...:)
Bill - Yes I was disappointed too by the news. That would have been so much fun blasting backwards then forwards. I wonder why S&S couldn't have devised something different to take care of unlikely rollbacks.
The question that remains, how is the car going to get to the top of the old lift hill? I highly doubt it will still have enough momentum to get up there.
olov, there are rumors about a second launch, but I am going with a chain. I would imagine that momentum will take it about all of the way up the hill and then the chain will take it up the rest. That's what they did with BSF. As for the spike, it is what it is. By going beyond vertical, it makes the momentum slow that much faster.
-Cal
Moosh & Bill - per your request, here is the OFFICIAL layout as shown at the press event. Finally got the pictures that one of my staff members took while they attended.
Swoosh - thanks for the layout.
*** Edited 11/16/2004 5:24:09 PM UTC by Mamoosh***
Still seems *awful unusual* to have THAT kind of (expensive) arrangement for rollback issues....but hey, HFEC's been doing this longer than I have, LOL...;)
I'm really excited now. :)
-Jacob
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Closed topic.