Cedar Point's Blog is teasing us!

Haha...I don't know what happened there (it was probably the alcohol ;)).

I've since fixed it so that it says what I wanted it to say.


It's still me, here from the beginning back in 1999. Add 1500+ posts to the number I have in the info section if you care about such things.
Why's everyone assuming the headstart is due to the massive size of whatever's being installed? It costs a lot less to have less people on-site (ie - labor and insurance costs) for longer if you're putting in a massive amount of installations.

Look at the footers of the Maverick flat ride that someone linked to before. The Point is I think the only Cedar Fair park without some variation on a Top Spin, so why not that linked ride?

One of those, maybe some other high-thrills, low-impact flat, a few interactive play areas for the kids, and a mid-sized coaster ... that's a LOT of concrete, a LOT of sitework, and it's got to be a lot cheaper to accomplish all of that over two off-seasons.

The tunnel vision on this subject is incredible ...


Brett, Resident Launch Whore Anti-Enthusiast (the undiplomatic one)

That footer, and the anchoring bolts sticking out of it are massive.

Maybe I just have really bad eyesight, but I don't see enough in that picture to even remotely estimate the size of the footer.


Some of you guys have me rolling on the floor with your outlandish ideas. The best part is you actually think it's going to happen. Ahhhh, the innocence of youth.

I am hoping for a bunch of smaller attractions with one major, although not 500 ft. major, attraction to be the star. How about a thrilling flat (thinking Top Spin or something never before seen), a family flat or two, a family coaster (water coaster or spinning coaster) and then to top it all off a 250 ft. Dive Machine with mulitple inversions that blows Sheikra away?

Probably not going to happen, especially all at once. But it seems like a much better way to spend their money than blowing it on a single attraction that would alienate a bunch of riders. There are a whole bunch of people that wouldn't touch a 450+ ft. looper, especially families!

As far as a woodie is concerned, I wouldn't mind one of those either. But I stick by my opinion, which I've stated several times before, that I'd like to see them tear down MS and put up a GCI dueler in that area with a jr. woodie thrown into the mix as well (think Stampida). I'll keep dreaming of that, while some of you keep dreaming of your 500 ft., 15 inversion, 2 mile long, bankrupty inducing, vomit comet. Sweet dreams! :)

*** Edited 3/7/2006 1:01:23 AM UTC by Incidentalist***


Yeah is Good!
The fact that people are still pushing for a dive machine has me rolling on the floor.

It's still me, here from the beginning back in 1999. Add 1500+ posts to the number I have in the info section if you care about such things.
I don't understand the whole dive machine idea. I'm not necessarily supporting the idea of a 500 footer, but the press and anticipation of one would far surpass a few family rides and a dive machine.

Why is making a huge coaster such a bad thing? This is my first post, but I read this site daily. I would do about anything to ride TTD or Ka. My friends were easily persuaded to accompany me in May to CP after finals(from Florida, USF pride!). Nobody wanted to go to IOA or USF....those parks lack serious thrills.

For example Dr. Doom's free-fall. I found that ride to be an incredibly watered down Power-Tower. Dueling Dragons is the only first class ride at that park. Spider-Man has no replay value and Hulk I didn't feel was anything special.

All I read on this forum is hatred of huge coasters. Yeah the dragster has had problems(it was down july 2, 2003 when i was at CP). For me thats what makes Sheikra weak. It's drop seems much less intense than MF and AC...if you are going to build a one trick pony(nothing else on Sheikra is special) at least make it taller than most coasters!

I rambled a bit, I have been wanting to post for awhile now and I finally decided so sorry if I bored you. But here is to hoping CP doesn't build a Dive machine.

Yummy! I love bait!

You yourself admitted that you weren't in the know early on in this thread. That shows that you DO NOT know what is coming. Yet you are one of the few still beating the drum of the 500 footer for some reason. I have yet to see anyone come up with any argument of why this would be a good investment for any park, much less CP.

Let me first say that I also don't know and I really don't care what they end up getting as I'll get back to CP at some point regardless of if they ever add anything new. A dive machine isn't even at the top of my list as I'd prefer to see a quality woodie, spinner or water coaster installed. But it does make more sense as a major attraction than a 500 footer. Can't see how that one has you rolling on the floor, other then the fact that your reputation precedes you.

And since it's been almost 4 years and you've yet to track down one of the elusive photos, I'll provide one for you. Enjoy!

http://www.rcdb.com/ig1412.htm?picture=12

*** Edited 3/7/2006 1:41:35 AM UTC by Incidentalist***


Yeah is Good!
And that to me is the biggest problem with these huge coasters. Everything else starts to seem weak and "forceless" by comparison. It does become like a drug, where people keep wanting to go higher and higher and faster and faster, with no regard for quality. Some of you are already so jaded.

Sorry, but I'd take most mid-sized B&Ms (including Sheikra) over the three big CP Intamins anyday. And I'd take most small CCI/GCIs over almost any record breaker. Why? Cause it's not about bigger being better. Why is Phantom's Revenge more thrilling than any ride at CP?

If they had a heavily themed Intamin Aquatrax (like the one that just killed a guy) that had dark ride elements, I'd be in heaven, seeing how a water ride was taken down (and they have no dark rides anymore!)

Wood would be good too....


Real Cbuzz quote of the day - "The classes i take in collage are so mor adcanced then u could imagen. Dont talk about my emglihs" - Adamforce
Incidentalist, the short answer to why CP would build a 500 footer is FREE PR and FREE Advertising. it's worth it's weight in gold, as CP has seen first hand with Magnum and MF.

Pithy enough.


Tom

Free! Sounds like a bargain to me.

Let's see, they could build a $50 Million dollar coaster and not have to pay one cent to advertise it, which they still would anyway.

Or they could invest that money in an attempt to bring in families to fill their $150/night hotels with something new for everbody. But then they'd have to spend THOUSANDS on ad compaigns.

I'm no good at math, which one makes more sense/cents?

It's too bad that all that free advertising they got for MF and TTD has worn off already that they need some more of it. I myself was almost forgetting the place even existed. ;)

*** Edited 3/7/2006 2:10:21 AM UTC by Incidentalist***


Yeah is Good!

Brian Noble said:

That footer, and the anchoring bolts sticking out of it are massive.

Maybe I just have really bad eyesight, but I don't see enough in that picture to even remotely estimate the size of the footer.


Brian, the evidence is all over the place. There's tracks in the dirt on top. If they're from a truck or a tractor, it doesn't make much of a difference, it still places the size of a tire relative to the footer. The most telling thing is directly to the right, just off the footer, there are 4-5 footprints in the mud. That shows that you're looking at a pretty massive footer.

Thank you Incidentalist for saying exactly what I said 3 posts later and claiming it for your own. There are like 10 people around here who all have hit on the idea of a "total package" of flats and medium sized coasters, and everyone's claiming that it's their own wonderful, stupendous, show-stopping idea. You're not the only one, and I'm not ... Moosh said it in this thread before anyone else did, and I said it in threads before that, and I'm sure Moosh said it before that, etc. etc.

And whoever it was that said height is like a drug, you're right, but fortunately, once you realize that height can only take you so "high" (bad pun, almost gator worthy!) you start to appreciate the power more than the height, and there are many more in the mid-sized category that have power (Talon, Fire Dragon, Magnum, Nitro [shut up LG!]) than in the super-sized category. If 450' doesn't satisfy you, what makes you think 500 would?


Brett, Resident Launch Whore Anti-Enthusiast (the undiplomatic one)
Incidentalist, get your facts straight. First, there isn't a hotel room on-site for $150/night except for Breakers Express. Second, they could probably get a 500 footer for $40 million, and third MF and Magnum were THE BEST DECISIONS CP HAS EVER MADE! We all know the issues with TTD and everyone makes a mistake - forget about TTD for this discusion.

CP doesn't care who fills their rooms, as long as they are full. Yes, they want to appeal to families, and most families have teenagers as well as kids.

No one knows what Maverick is, and I certainly don't either - but your logic is weak.


Tom

Man, the anticapation feels so weird right now...I can't wait for my trip to CP....
bobthecoasterguy's avatar

Thom25 said:
CP doesn't care who fills their rooms, as long as they are full.

Umm...don't you have to be 21 to get a room at most hotels? And what teenagers do you know that have enough money to get a hotel room for a couple nights? Families are where the money's at, and I'm sure CP has realized that.


--Erich

Bob - tru tru. You actually only need to be 18 to rent a room, but what 18 year old has that kind of loot. My point was trying to illustrate a record breaking coaster will fill the rooms (probably for a year or two).

I honestly don't follow the logic of other posters who say - look at the size of the footers (they are huge), followed by, family rides and mid sized coasters is what CP is getting? Sorry, this is CP. Huge footers two years in advance, after 4 years of waiting leads me to only one conclusion (sorry).


Tom

Incidentalist, I'm not sure if you are referring to Thom25 or me, but in case you are you talking about me, I can assure you that I never said that I didn't know what was coming.

And if you paid attention to my sig, you would know that I've been around since 1999...obviously being around that long, I've never even heard of rcbd...

[edit] That's actually not accurate with regards to Cedar Point hotels. They do require those reserving the rooms to be 21. I honestly think that they cost themselves bookings because of this, but maybe they think it helps cut down on the number of problems by having this policy too.

*** Edited 3/7/2006 3:17:56 AM UTC by CPgenius***


It's still me, here from the beginning back in 1999. Add 1500+ posts to the number I have in the info section if you care about such things.

CPgenius said:
Those not commenting on this subject speaks volumes...

(I/E those "in the know" aren't dismissing it as a an absurd work of fiction)


That was the post I was referring to. Seems to me like you weren't including yourself as "in the know".

I know you've been around for a long time, but you mentioned that you hadn't seen pictures of the current looping record holder. It's not like they're hard to find and they have decent pictures of the restraints.

That's all.


Yeah is Good!
Obviously I've seen pics of the Colossus, but when it was new, I never paid attention to how their restraint system was set up. One reason would be because at the time I didn't hold the ride's restraint system pertinent.

Well, the obvious ones "in the know" about happenings at CP are Jeff and Walt. I don't think we've seen them post in this thread yet. Although Jeff has said stuff during the Podcast, he hasn't felt the need to ridicule the 500 footer rumor in this thread.


It's still me, here from the beginning back in 1999. Add 1500+ posts to the number I have in the info section if you care about such things.

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums - ©2024, POP World Media, LLC
Loading...