CW 2012

Oh, I wasn't suggesting they were wrong...


My author website: mgrantroberts.com

DaveStroem's avatar

Raven-Phile, I personally love the 2nd gen trains. I see way to many of the 4 across trains going out with 1 or 2 empty seats on multiple rows. From my experience many GP think all coasters are 2 across seating and I have seen a group of 4 break up only to have 2 rows with 2 empty seats.

I also think that there is a major epidemic of cooties at amusement parks. People just don't want to sit next to strangers. A properly run station with 2nd gen trains and a single rider line can all but eliminate empty seats.

I would imagine that the 4 across trains are much shorter then the 2nd gen trains and would not need as large of a station especially if they have a separate load/unload area. The shorter trains I would think are als lighter weight and thus would change the rides dynamics as well as lesson wear.


Before you can be older and wiser you first have to be young and stupid.

Raven-Phile's avatar

I don't know why, but the difference between Diamondback and Nitro to me is amazing. I absolutely love those original trains.

I can't say I blame people for not wanting to sit next to each other these days, with people's bad attitudes and not caring about others around them, that's just what happens. I've seen SR lines work out on the 4-across seating (Apollo's Chariot was a fine example at one time), so I'm thinking if anyone can do it, CF can.

Last edited by Raven-Phile,
Jason Hammond's avatar

Raven-Phile said:
I'm thinking if anyone can do it, CF can.

As much of a CF fanboy as I am, I'm not sure where you get that idea from. The Maverick single rider line (SRL) isn't even used half the time because they don't always have an op at the top of the stairs. Plus, it doesn't benefit the individual very much when you can't get to the line until 10 minutes before you'd be on the ride anyway.

The I-305 SRL was scrapped less than half way through the first season due to improper management of the lines length.

The Diamondback line is also gone. It's now being used as a Fast Pass line.

Last edited by Jason Hammond,

884 Coasters, 34 States, 7 Countries
http://www.rollercoasterfreak.com My YouTube

Raven-Phile's avatar

Jason Hammond said:


The Diamondback line is also gone. It's now being used as a Fast Pass line.

Not necessarily with a Single Rider Line, but a B&M "hyper" with 4-across seating instead of the new trains. I'd certainly expect them to be able to pull it off.

Tekwardo's avatar

Carowinds gets great use of the SRL ( single rider line for those playI g along at home). Oh, and Josh, from what the B&M rep said at coasterstock last year, I doubt you'll see the older trains return.


Website | Flickr | Instagram | YouTube | Twitter | Facebook

Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened.

Raven-Phile's avatar

Meh. I'm just not a fan of the new trains at all. Was there a reason they were retired?

LostKause's avatar

Yep. They were boring. :p


I prefer 2nd gen trains too.. CW solved the emtpy seat isssue last year. Behemoth trains never have an empty pair of seats... Only emtpy seats are single rides. The wings are for people like us, and the tight seats are for 1st time riders, teen girls, and assorted other GP.

If you look closly at the logo there is a shadow of windseeker to the right of its left eye... only noticable with a light background. It indicates thats this ride will be taller.

http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/zz188/dkny6363/34is0lx.png

Look to the right of the left eye ;)

Last edited by DKNY6363,
Raven-Phile's avatar

I still don't like the new trains. Or Krause.

Both are fine... Behemoth is my favourite B&M Hyper so.... I just love the roomyness of the wings.

rollergator's avatar

SFoG's Goliath runs the old trains, as does Apollo. Might be layouts, but I've yet to really *hit* either my butt or the lapbar on any of the rides with the new trains. Gotten some seriously nice floats, and a few fairly crunchy landings in the back rows....but I have to believe at this point that the new B&M train design reduces the forces imparted to the ride. Until I ride something and get a different experience, I like the old 4-across trains better in terms of forcefulness (but I do appreciate the better views from the new trains).

Or Krause.

^ well said.

Just realized... my bias towards the new trains(Behemoth) may change next year(Leviathan). ;)

As much as I don't want to, I may need to acquire a passport before next summer...


And then one day you find ten years have got behind you
No one told you when to run, you missed the starting gun

CoasterDemon's avatar

I think the 2 low hills are a first for B&M. Maybe that's what is supposed to be the big deal. Coasters have had 'speed bumps' (a small hill placed between 2 larger hills) for 100 years, but maybe since it's B&M's first time doing it... eh, forget it.

No splash down or tunnels? First drop into a concrete trough. Hmmm... this is going to be interesting. I hope they fix the 'B&M rattle'.

edit - And where is the last 1/3rd of the ride? A break run that is taller than Dragon Fire? Cool logo though :)

Last edited by CoasterDemon,
Billy

I guess I'll have to check that out next year. I haven't been there since flight deck.

OhioStater's avatar

I find myself very underwhelmed.

How is this different than Behemoth?

delan's avatar

Its CW's version of Intimidator I guess. Cedar Fair is probably fed up with the Intamin drama of late. But you're right....I don't get it. I could see this at Knotts...but not here...


PS...is it me, or is everyone's post (starting with gator's) is in Italics?

Last edited by delan,

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums - ©2024, POP World Media, LLC
Loading...