Raven-Phile, I personally love the 2nd gen trains. I see way to many of the 4 across trains going out with 1 or 2 empty seats on multiple rows. From my experience many GP think all coasters are 2 across seating and I have seen a group of 4 break up only to have 2 rows with 2 empty seats.
I also think that there is a major epidemic of cooties at amusement parks. People just don't want to sit next to strangers. A properly run station with 2nd gen trains and a single rider line can all but eliminate empty seats.
I would imagine that the 4 across trains are much shorter then the 2nd gen trains and would not need as large of a station especially if they have a separate load/unload area. The shorter trains I would think are als lighter weight and thus would change the rides dynamics as well as lesson wear.
Before you can be older and wiser you first have to be young and stupid.
I don't know why, but the difference between Diamondback and Nitro to me is amazing. I absolutely love those original trains.
I can't say I blame people for not wanting to sit next to each other these days, with people's bad attitudes and not caring about others around them, that's just what happens. I've seen SR lines work out on the 4-across seating (Apollo's Chariot was a fine example at one time), so I'm thinking if anyone can do it, CF can.
Raven-Phile said:
I'm thinking if anyone can do it, CF can.
As much of a CF fanboy as I am, I'm not sure where you get that idea from. The Maverick single rider line (SRL) isn't even used half the time because they don't always have an op at the top of the stairs. Plus, it doesn't benefit the individual very much when you can't get to the line until 10 minutes before you'd be on the ride anyway.
The I-305 SRL was scrapped less than half way through the first season due to improper management of the lines length.
The Diamondback line is also gone. It's now being used as a Fast Pass line.
884 Coasters, 34 States, 7 Countries
http://www.rollercoasterfreak.com My YouTube
I prefer 2nd gen trains too.. CW solved the emtpy seat isssue last year. Behemoth trains never have an empty pair of seats... Only emtpy seats are single rides. The wings are for people like us, and the tight seats are for 1st time riders, teen girls, and assorted other GP.
If you look closly at the logo there is a shadow of windseeker to the right of its left eye... only noticable with a light background. It indicates thats this ride will be taller.
http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/zz188/dkny6363/34is0lx.png
Look to the right of the left eye ;)
SFoG's Goliath runs the old trains, as does Apollo. Might be layouts, but I've yet to really *hit* either my butt or the lapbar on any of the rides with the new trains. Gotten some seriously nice floats, and a few fairly crunchy landings in the back rows....but I have to believe at this point that the new B&M train design reduces the forces imparted to the ride. Until I ride something and get a different experience, I like the old 4-across trains better in terms of forcefulness (but I do appreciate the better views from the new trains).
Or Krause.
I think the 2 low hills are a first for B&M. Maybe that's what is supposed to be the big deal. Coasters have had 'speed bumps' (a small hill placed between 2 larger hills) for 100 years, but maybe since it's B&M's first time doing it... eh, forget it.
No splash down or tunnels? First drop into a concrete trough. Hmmm... this is going to be interesting. I hope they fix the 'B&M rattle'.
edit - And where is the last 1/3rd of the ride? A break run that is taller than Dragon Fire? Cool logo though :)
You must be logged in to post