Seeing that I can finally go back to PKI for 2007 after a two-season hiatus, it'll be wierd to go back on SOB without the only redeeming quality of the ride. While I loved the ride and would purposely sit in the back seat with the wife to get the crap kicked out of us, the day-ending headache won't be missed.
Here's what I'm wondering. If the new trains will allow a smoother ride experience and there's less jerking, would this mean a faster ride?
I can't imagine going through the "Rosebowl" at a faster speed with the intensity it already has!
~Rob Willi
Son of Drachen Fire?
Obviously a padded comfy MF that turns will cut the maintainance of the ride by 3/4s.
Im just wondering if the loop drop is going to be full speed into the second helix or a air hop will be added. Yeah, some realingment will need done but its a hundred plus yards and can be done gradually.
Chuck
Considering the length of SOB is already fairly close to the Beast's, I don't think they will consider getting much closer to that record, and I highly doubt they would consider giving that record to SOB.
Of course, they've now gained some length to work with since the loop is gone, but still.
I think it will be a gradual transition, as Charles suggested--perhaps a long, drawn out s-curve or something.
Again, I may be grasping at straws with this, but feel free to ponder my thoughts. :D
I can here the people in line now..."it used to have a loop, but the train fell off in it and they had to take it down"....or you can insert your own falsehood....
". . . don't you know baby that life is a scream!" - Gordon Gano
Andy also brings up a good point, are you going to count it again? We do with Phantoms Revenge. Granted PR was allmost a completly new ride where as SOB will have new trains, no loop, maybe more.
Would this change give it enough to beat its papa in length? My uneducated guess is no since the loop had a fair amount of track in it (or at least enough for an airtime hill) but I agree there is no way they make SOB longer then the Beast.
2022 Trips: WDW, Sea World San Diego & Orlando, CP, KI, BGW, Bay Beach, Canobie Lake, Universal Orlando
If so, why are they adding more solid structural support to the ride to prevent it from 'giving'? Doesn't that go against the theory above?
My understanding in the simplest terms:
The kind of trains needed to handle the loop weigh too much for the rest of the layout - destroying it. Remove the loop, add lighter trains, problem solved.
*** Edited 12/14/2006 6:28:01 PM UTC by Lord Gonchar***
You must be logged in to post