Valleyfair replaced this rare classic with the same thing.
Only without the shade or snack machines. Or any new ride that season at all.
Happens all the time.
-'Playa
*** Edited 2/16/2005 9:17:55 PM UTC by CoastaPlaya***
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
--George H
Check the archive for my angry thread "VF 1998 - it SUXXXX!!!!!!!111111oneoneoneonewunwunwun
-'Playa
*** Edited 2/16/2005 9:25:43 PM UTC by CoastaPlaya***
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
I think the 'new attraction coming in 2005!' sign, and then nothing coming bothers people the most... Like dangling a carrot in front of the patrons face and snatching it away..
I have since found out what the attraction that was to be 'coming soon for 2005'... If I told you, it wouldn't surprise ANYONE..
If it happens to be installed during the year, thats great.. If not, I won't be THAT upset... I can ride a similar attractions not too far from here.
Schwarzkopf shuttle loops...The most possible fun in 36 seconds.
Chitown said:
And where would this park be right now if it wasn't for SF taking it over?CLOSED!!!!
Get over it and be glad the park still operates.
Not necessarily. There were other buyers interested in taking over the operation but New Orleans City Council had a hard on for Six Flags. We'll never know how Ripley's or some of the others might have handled the property better or worse, but the park would have likely remained open.
I am still not getting it. It's just an amusement park for god's sake.
If people are frustrated with SFNO so much, either move closer to a better operated park or discontinue the hobby.
My favorite MJ tune: "Billie Jean" which I have been listening to alot now. RIP MJ.
You can see how often CF parks get two coasters in one year. Or one coaster in one year. Or coasters removed and replaced with clones of smaller coasters.
Then come back and complain!
-CO
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
SF spent $25+mil in one year on SFNO. I believe they had up to 5 years to spend $25 mil on that park in the agreement they reached. There were an awful lot of parks that didn't get any new attractions that year because SF invested so much of their cap ex in that park. I'm sure old plans had to be scrapped and new plans are being drawn up on just how they are going to use the land. It's time to just wait and see what happens.
On the rides they are removing, who knows why they are removing them, it could be because they aren't safe, maintenance nightmares etc... or maybe they are justing removing them to tick you off.
A day at the park is what you make it!
BOO-FREAKIN' HOO. Get used to it; other parks have gone far longer.
-Nate
-CO
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
You must be logged in to post