The fact is SFGAdv will hold the record for tallest and fastest coaster even if it is only a few feet taller and a few mph faster. You all didn't doubt Steel Dragon 2000 when it opened after Millennium Force even though it was only a feet tall and a few mph faster. SFGAdv gets the bragging rights and people who rode TTD will no longer be able to say they've rode the tallest and fastest coaster until they've ridden SFGAdv's new ride, simple as that...
If you can't stand the heights, get out of the line.
ApolloAndy said:
Kris Wempa said:
somethingWhatever you say....
I don't see S:UF stack that much, but I've *only* been to the park 9 times so far this season.
It all comes down to how quickly the operators can launch the trains. I agree that there's no need for 2 stations *IF* the operators can launch a train in 1-2 minutes. The ideal scenario is to always have 1 train going through the circuit and 1 train loading. Then, when the train finishes the circuit, it should have little to no wait before moving into the station. This has DEFINITELY not been the case any of the times that I've been on S:UF. I also agree that the restraints are so well designed that there's NO reason the operators should take 3-4 minutes to launch the trains. Well, they DO take that long (at least everytime I've been there). As a result, a line that should be no longer than 45 minutes ends up being 1 and 1/2 hours.
I have said before that I would rather see CP start spending some money on quality vs. quantity. I want the wow factor sitting in the train vs. looking at it from the midway.
Lastly, I would be hesitant to green-light a project like Dragster without first knowing that all of the problems with it have been worked out.
Coaster Lover said:
It's what we all call "compitition." You see, it's compitition that keeps coasters going taller and taller.
I kind of agree with that. But at the same time, that's exactly what's not interesting or good about things right now. Wouldn't things be a lot more fun if that last line read:
"You see, it's competition that makes coasters better and better"
Taller does not equal better.
That's why you're seeing people mentioning taking a few hours to check this record breaker out when they hit Dorney next year. :)
I mean, it's a great marketing angle and all, but as an enthusiast I'd rather see a better coaster, not a taller coaster.
*** Edited 9/23/2004 12:42:01 PM UTC by Lord Gonchar***
the Cedar Point fanboys are all out and angry
I guess Cedar Point fanboys have such a reputation, people already know what they're going to say before they even say it! Someone's going to take a world record from Cedar Point. Gee, that's never happened before. Quick, someone get me a tissue.
Records are fun, especially for marketing. But if anyone here thinks that world records equals best park or best coaster, then you don't understand the business. If a park thinks it helps the bottom line to break a record, then they should do it. It's not done to satisfy one's ego.
*** Edited 9/23/2004 1:00:51 PM UTC by Gemini***
Walt Schmidt - Co-Publisher, PointBuzz
*sigh*
Bad bad...so yah, I'd love to be there, but I'll be somewhere else. But my interest is piqued. (Nitro, did I spell that correctly?) ;)
WAIT UNTIL THE ANNOUNCEMENT. If it's 421.5ft then you can bash the coaster.
Maybe its just a lighting trick. (?)
Ben Ryker
And Rail, there are at least 15 pieces of launch track on site. By comparison, TTD's got 14 pieces of launch. I'm gonna go ahead and say it's a safe bet that the original track length figure is wrong.
*** Edited 9/23/2004 6:57:24 PM UTC by Nitro Dave***
When I was at CP over Labor Day weekend, my sig. other thought that Dragster looked rather...er...phallic. So could we just say that this is a fight between the parks to see who has the biggest...er...phallic symbol?
Maybe it's just a pissing contest?
It's not the quality of the ride that matters, it's the size of your tophat? *** Edited 9/23/2004 8:10:41 PM UTC by Kick The Sky***
Certain victory.
Closed topic.