Rob Ascough said:
According to RCDB, SFMM does... check it out.I always thought it was SFGAdv because people generally count the inversions on shuttles only once (like The Chiller) but then I remembered that SFMM has Deja Vu, which "evens" the number of shuttle inversions.
Yeah, but I count 5 shuttle inversions on Chiller and 3 on DV...
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
ApolloAndy said:
Kris Wempa said:something else
Then the solution is to get better ops, not to drop another $1M on a station.
I agree. My original point was that SFGAdv needs to consider ride capacity with this ride. A lot of their ride ops are pathetically slow. 4 minutes to launch a S:UF train is ridiculous. Nitro and Medusa both have a good capacity. B&R: The Chiller has a terrible capacity (20 people per launch, 2.5 - 3 minutes between launches). To make things worse, they rarely run both sides.
Haha no I'm not giving Patrick the finger
Austin-GO JEFF GORDON AND THE TITANS!!!!!!!
-Dennis
www.XtremeCoasters.com
Big D said:
...atleast 460 FT. Anything less then that wouldn't really make it that historic.
Then I guess maybe It won't be that Historic for you...
:)
-Mark
Never Has Gravity Been So Uplifting.
nitro230ft said:
Batman and Robin don't launch together because the launch would cut the power in the park. As for timing...having gone to the Florida parks this summer, I agree that the backup in the lines is pathetic! Nitro, Medusa and Batman run smooth but all the other coaster have terrible loading time. Even Viper has a long wait! I know, they only run one train but when that train gets in the station it takes for ever for people to get in and get the damn train out again.
I wasn't referring to B&R LAUNCHING at the same time, but merely RUNNING BOTH SIDES at the same time. The only way to make that ride have a 1/2 way decent capacity is to run both sides simultaneously. Otherwise, the capacity is terrible.
My finger (take a guess which one) goes up to all CP fanboys who got to brag for 2 years about they're over-rated rocket coaster.
As for the rest of the coasters at CP, I was totally ready to hand them my "greatest coasters in the world" word untill I got there this summer and was greatly dissapointed. Almost none of the coasters there surpassed equal style coasters (stand-up, inverted, wood, etc..) at other parks that I have been on. Yes they have the height and speed, but just not that "punch" I get from other rides around the globe. TTD was definitly breathtaking, but over-hyped in my opinon. I have yet to find one coaster that is even a contender for "X".
My only complaint is that this sucker, and the record, ain't gonna be at Magic Mountain...we'll see how long that lasts...
The ride isnt going to run, they allready have two rides not running how they should, Rolling Thunder and Batman & Robin not to mention half their flat rides. What makes anyone think this one will run well? And if it does run, which coaster will be neglected to keep it running.
I can only imagine what the capacity will be.
What a mess, I have no faith.
longhairedspaz said:
My finger (take a guess which one) goes up to all CP fanboys who got to brag for 2 years about they're over-rated rocket coaster.
Yeah, its so over rated that you yourself said that it was worth the trip alone to CP. Who is the fan boy now, Ass Hat?
In case you don't remember giving TTD your other finger up (you'r thumb, dumbass...), here's the link:
http://coasterbuzz.com/forum.aspx?mode=thread&TopicID=38509&page=1
Yet again, I smell troll...
Closed topic.