And Maryland is definitely more "northern" (culturally speaking) than West Virginia (IMO). Heck VIRGINIA is more northern than WVa.
lata, jeremy
--who now techincally lives in the South
2Hostyl said:And Maryland is definitely more "northern" (culturally speaking) than West Virginia (IMO). Heck VIRGINIA is more northern than WVa.
Are you talking about Baltimore, or are you talking about the little sliver of Maryland that's squeezed bewteen Pennsylvania and West Virginia? Because if it's the latter, that's definitely southern.
I would put the line between northeast and southeast between Virginia and North Carolina.
Oh wait--that was on topic. (Slaps forehead) Never mind. Is TOO Midwest!
-'Playa
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
Joe, thinks S&S launch, but has no insider information!
For example - western PA.
People around here like to think of themselves as "east coast" when in reality they have very little in common with the east coast.
Pittsburgh and Philly may be in the same state but they're worlds apart in attitude, lifestyle, quality of life, etc.
The change occurs as soon as you cross the mountains that divide the state. That's where I'd draw the line. (same could probably be said for NY too)
Pittsburgh and the surrounding area fits in perfectly with the whole Ohio, Indiana "Midwest" rural thing.
Just a little pet peeve of mine - especially since I just moved back to Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh has got to be one of the most "rural" cities in the country.
If I were to divide the country it'd probably be:
New England
Mid-Atlantic
South
Midwest
Southwest
The West
EDIT - Mine would be similar to this map - except the "midwest" would also include the top part of Kentucky and WV and include the western portions of PA and NY.
If I was feeling froggy, I'd also split the south into the "South" and "Southeast" and cut the panhandle off of Florida and draw the line right up the borders of GA, SC, NC and VA - calling those states the Southeast.
The West could probably be divided into two more telling sections too, but you have to be flakey to liveout west ;) - so we'll just bunch that whole area together :)
*** Edited 1/22/2004 7:40:21 PM UTC by Lord Gonchar***
OK, I'm gonna stop rambling now. :)
"Want to be upside down, maybe thrown from side to side" - The New Pornographers, The Fake Headlines
That sums up Midwest about as perfectly as one can!
Ummm, who's Brian Wilson. Did he write that song for Diamond Dave? ;)
They'd only have to top 127' (AE) to be the tallest woodie in the Mid-whatever. And if it isn't wood, it isn't a coaster anyway, right?
-'Playa
(airing out the only possible explanation)
*** Edited 1/22/2004 8:27:38 PM UTC by CoastaPlaya***
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
Rich G
Lord Gonchar said:Ummm, who's Brian Wilson. Did he write that song for Diamond Dave?
Yeah, I'm not entirely sure who he is...some fat guy in a Barenaked Ladies song. ;)
"Want to be upside down, maybe thrown from side to side" - The New Pornographers, The Fake Headlines
But you and I both know that marketing types like to be fuzzy. :)
Sounds like Big Chief is gonna start playing in the big leagues, whatever the new ride turns out to be. I'm pretty happy for them!
Joe
Amusement Park Personal Checks at <A HREF="http://www.carouselchecks.com/referral.asp?refid=112">www.carouselchecks.com</A>
now back to the topic, I've looked at the tallest coasters in that region on RCDB, and teh tallest is Mr. Freeze at SFStL, and then Deja Vu and Raging Bull at SFGAm, all of which are around 210'. For somereason I still see big chiefs as being too small a park to put in a 200 ft hyper, so I'm picturing a shuttle/impulse.
but now thinking of the prices of those, it would be just as cheap to put in a ful circut... I just don't know any more. brain hurts... good bye
You must be logged in to post