I want to put this situation into perspective. Cedar Fair and Six Flags run their parks in different ways. Cedar Point likes to take their time in terms of building new rides and attractions, whereas Six Flags likes to put as much as they can into a single park at a single time. Look at SFOhio. Last year they put in four new coasters, several new rides and new "theming", but the park in no better than when it was Geauga Lake. The same thing goes for SFMM. They are putting in 3 coasters so they can have the title. However this doesn't make the park the best park in the world. It still has clones(cause they're cheaper to build), and nothing else in the park has changed. They put in nearly a coaster a year with many misses. CP, however, spreads their intruductions of new rides over several years (an average of 1 every 2 years). Both companies have different ways of introducing new rides. i.e., I agree that S:TE is a coaster, but should it be considered 415' high when the cars don't even reach that height? For marketing reasons, it is good to have the most, and ___est coasters, but as riders, we are the winners. We get to ride great rides and have fun doing it. In the end, both parks have their own unique qualities, and their own unique rides experiences. MM is located off a highway where there are nothing but brown hills. CP is located on a peninsula off Lake Erie and has been around for 130 years. Their rides are vastly different. So forget about all this most stuff. In the end, we still get great rides. MM will continue being the park it is, spendind money like water and building coasters nonstop, and CP will still be voted #1 by nearly every poll(i.e. Amusement Today, Inside Track, Applause Award, and many other publications and organizations) for its combination of coasters, rides, and other attractions.