AirtimeSROS said:
"And you can get a great view from ANY seat on an Intamin."
SFGA2001 said:
"Maybe you're right, busch gardens1, but has B&M made a Millennium Force? I could say "Most of you only like B&M because of Nitro. Intamin is way better." What else are you going to judge a company by? The employee's looks? No. You judge Intamin hypers by how good the ones you have ridden are. MF is a great ride, much better than RB, IMO, so I like Intamin hypers more.
-------------
.
I just wanted to point out that mf is loved because of it's speed, height, and steepness. anyone can make a coaster taller, faster, and steeper, but B&M can design good coaster without those things. Examples are all three of the B&M hypers which dont even topped 250 ft. Im not saying Intamin can't design a hyper w/o height, speed, and steepness, because they can [S:ROS (SFNE)] im just saying that B&M creates true masterpieces w/o the qualities of mf, but when B&M do top 300 ft. i have a feeling it will be a lot better than mf giving more than just one or two moments of airtime.
I only do it on "they" meaning park employees or park management/managers.
StealthmF5m3 said:
"S:RoS at SFDL: The helixes look lame because you drop, turn, up the second hill. When you get to the helix, is look tame. There is maximum height limit, and that ain't cool if your tall, then you can't go on the ride.
The track looks like Wild Mouse coasters on the helix. Not appealing to me.
"B&M til' the last drop"
"Duff Man Says... Ohhhhh Yaaaaa!"
Current Favorite Coasters:
1)Raging Bull 2)Millennium Force 3)Medusa (SFMW) 4)Vertical Velocity (SFGAm) 5)Dueling Dragons (Ice)
*** This post was edited by StealthmF5m3 on 8/17/2001. ***"
You must be logged in to post