WW = Worst Expansion Ever

I think what really has most people upset is that the expansion costs $30 (same as the original game!) and yet all it includes is a bunch of objects. No new game play, no new rides, no bug fixes, no nothing. It just dumps a few meg of objects into your Objdata folder.

If the price were more appropriate, like $9.99, you'd see a lot fewer upset people. For $29.99, people expect bugs to be fixed and a few new rides or something.

Every expansion for RCT1 included new things, including new game-play changes, new rides, etc. And the new things were more or less realistic. Monkey car trains? There's just nothing realistic or "generally useful" (outside the designated pre-packaged scenreos) that these 'new' things are useful for. So why pay that much money? For 16 new sceneos? We have a scenereo editor and an object editor already. We can get much of this stuff free.

It just looks, sounds, and smells like a total rip-off.

Does it remove any of the limits on scenery in the game?

I mean what would be the point of adding tons of new objects and still having the limit of how much scenery you can have in a scenario.

However, I bet it doesn't alter this, judging by what a failure it is on every other front.

Lord Gonchar's avatar
eyeamthu1, look at this thread

Towards the end there is discussion about the scenery limits and why they exist.


------------------
www.coasterimage.com
Dorney Park Visits in 2003: 2

Anonymouse, I like monkeys.

I'm still not going to buy this game, excuse me, "scenery package", for 30 bucks. That is a BIT much.

For everyone here that is being all high and mighty telling everyone that they're spoiled brats and as paying customers aren't entitled to a game that pleases them, I just thought I'd pass along the information that two of my good friends who I got into playing RCT recently bought WW ...

And have since taken it back. One bought it and warned the other before she opened it not to even bother. She at least got her money back, but my other friend is stuck. So, sorry to burst your bubble people, but there are non-enthusiasts who are really pissed off by a bunch of scenery instead of rides and coasters too. In fact, one of them mentioned that if they had even included new pre-built coasters (cause she uses those most of the time) she would have kept it, but not for a bunch of scenery.
------------------
"You know we got a good thing goin and I don't wanna see it end" --Reel Big Fish
-- Brett

Lord Gonchar's avatar
Consider me among the high and mighty.

Here's the A#1 reason the complaining is unwarranted:

It was never presented as anything other than that.

If you really thought "50 new rides" meant new coasters and flats after seeing screenshots and reading promotional material about the game then I have a ton of stuff I'd like to sell you...and technically they are new as they were not available in the game before this add-on.

It's all about using your head.

------------------
www.coasterimage.com
Dorney Park Visits in 2003: 2



*** This post was edited by Lord Gonchar 5/9/2003 2:16:51 PM ***

Personally I wasn't going to buy it anyway as I'm not that impressed with RCT2 beyond the banked turns on some of the coasters. Other than that, to make a "nice" park now requires so much more effort to theme it properly and build stations that its turned into a chore, rather than a game.

But yes, I agree it wasn't presented as more than that - if you read these boards religiously and knew enough from looking at the screenshots to notice that the rides weren't really different without the game telling you so. You're claim that it was never expected to be anything but is also very "enthusiass" because for someone who has no idea what coasterbuzz is, never saw a screenshot, and just likes to play the game, WW was supposed to be an "expansion" just like all the previous "expansions" which included new rides, however few there were.

If you can present me with one way that a GP walking through Best Buy that sees a new RCT box is going to figure out from the packaging and a few pictures on the box that this expansion doesn't follow the rules of previous expansions and doesn't have new rides or anything more than some new scenery, then more power to you. But until then, I feel like you are acting like the brat, not being able to admit that maybe there was misleading advertising, and maybe there should be a little more to this "expansion pack". Let people have their opinions once in a while ...

Lord Gonchar's avatar

But yes, I agree it wasn't presented as more than that - if you read these boards religiously and knew enough from looking at the screenshots to notice that the rides weren't really different without the game telling you so. You're claim that it was never expected to be anything but is also very "enthusiass" because for someone who has no idea what coasterbuzz is, never saw a screenshot, and just likes to play the game, WW was supposed to be an "expansion" just like all the previous "expansions" which included new rides, however few there were.

There are new rides - 50 newly themed rides that weren't available before. More than in any other expansion for the series to date. In fact, I'd think it's the people who don't read the message boards religously and are "GP" that are probably most happy with the game. They for the most part (being GP) don't know that there's no rocket coaster or no fishook coaster. At best there's one or two rides that they enjoy at their local park that aren't included and, by the very nature of being GP, they probably really don't put much thought into it.

There are two distinct markets for this game - sim gamers and coaster enthusiats. I'd image the former makes up a signifcantly larger portion of the market, while the latter would tend to be more critical and passionate about the game. (god knows we've seen that ;) ) - The thing is it isn't the enthusiasts who made this game sell over a million copies. The right people are ok with this add-on as far as Infrogames (Atari) sees it from a business standpoint.

The real "enthusiasses" are those who nitpick over such little details that are missing from the game. Look at some of the wishlists of what enthusiats (not gamers) want from this game. 95% of it is unrealistic and no matter what gets thrown at them, they'll complain.

------------------
www.coasterimage.com
Dorney Park Visits in 2003: 2

I'm not saying I didn't expect this, it's just not worth 30 bucks.
Lord Gonchar's avatar
Well, that makes sense. And I can't argue with that. But you didn't go out and buy it, then complain when you got exactly what was promised but didn't include the things you'd hoped for.

Big difference in approach there.

------------------
www.coasterimage.com
Dorney Park Visits in 2003: 2



*** This post was edited by Lord Gonchar 5/9/2003 2:37:08 PM ***

hmmm, maybe WW should have been a patch which you could download?

------------------

Colossus [1]
Nemesis: Inferno [6]

LG - you're not giving GP their due credit. People ARE smart enough to figure out that a drop-down menu with a different kind of looking coaster car *isn't* a new ride. These people are used to Loopy Landscapes which had truly new coasters, and rides, made from scratch which were included. I pointed out that I know of at least 2 pure-GP and probably more who do feel gipped by the game and think that its crap, and that will weigh heavily on them ever trusting RCT to buy another game or if they're observant enough , things from the Infrogames label.

And I'm not complaining about a "wishlist" not in the game. As far as I'm concerned, my "wishlist" for RCT will never be in there (more realistic coaster) which is why I bought No Limits and Hyper Rails. You keep claiming that 95% of the people who buy this game see it as sufficient, but from what I've seen on these boards and in regular day-to-day life, its the other way around.

UK Nemesis - you should work for Infrogame's marketing dept. ;)

I figured it out when I saw NO new looking rides in the screenshots. The only near new-looking ride was that whole Chaos thing , and I had my doubts.
Lord Gonchar's avatar

LG - you're not giving GP their due credit. People ARE smart enough to figure out that a drop-down menu with a different kind of looking coaster car *isn't* a new ride.

But it IS a new ride. Was it there before? No. Then it's new. Again, the disappointed comes from the interpretation of "new". I maintain that most of the people (easily 95%) who purchase this game will not feel ripped off in any way.

Dictionary.com's entry for "new" - which of these criteria is not met with these additional themed rides?

The average RCT player isn't obsessing about the lack of a giant frisbee or chaos ride then spouting off to the world via the internet about how they (infogrames) lied and it's a ripoff and we should all boycott the RCT series. They're enjoying the new scenery and the abililty to create fully themed parks and the challenge of new scenarios. These boards don't represent the "average" RCT player by a long shot.

------------------
www.coasterimage.com
Dorney Park Visits in 2003: 2

if you really think about it, rct 1 had a patch which was basically what this is. there was the added coaster designs/ tracks and fixs to bug, plus some new scenarios to download... get the point? i'm just saying though, if there is to be a rct3, then this could cost the company alot when people who weren't happy with WW won't buy RCT3 straight away. (then they are bought for less.)

------------------

Colossus [1]
Nemesis: Inferno [6]

I just bought Wacky Worlds today. I was pretty dissapointed on what I saw in it. I was hopeing for flat rides and more scenery choices also. Didnt they say there would be more real park recreations in this one? Not what I expected to see.
------------------
9 Years working at Valleyfair :)! Dragster Cedar Point Trip Countdown 17days! Club member 437.
Well it seems to me like you're just rationalizing so your point is still valid, and if that's how you want to go about it, then I can't change that. But I am telling you that the GP that I know that are not hardcore players, are not enthusiasts, are not even sim-game enthusiasts, are disappointed in this expansion pack.

UK Nemesis, you're exactly right - I know I'm one of thsoe customers who won't buy RCT3 until its down to the $9.99 special rack and I know that the two friends who just tried out WW will probably not even buy RCT3 at all ...

Lord Gonchar's avatar
Cool enough, PittDesigner. Agree to disagree. I love a good debate :)

Take a look at this thread though:

http://www.coasterbuzz.com/forum.aspx?mode=thread&TopicID=29498

Just read through the comments. Even after it's obvious that the "new" rides are just rethemed versions - there's just people who refuse to believe it. It's actually hilarious. I've never posted a more prophetic post in my life (15th post)

It all played out exactly like I guessed it would. You can see people making "wishlists" and guessing that even if there are new themes on old rides that there HAS to be some new ones. How can you not be disappointed when you ignore the facts and set your expectations so high?

I haven't seen, heard or know anyone who didn't do this that is truly unhappy with the new options.

------------------
www.coasterimage.com
Dorney Park Visits in 2003: 2

Lord Gonchar's avatar
On a different angle. Anyone know where you can get sales figures for PC games? I'd like to see how the sales go week to week. If that many people are truly unhappy with WW then we should see a sharp decline in sales past this first week due to poor word of mouth.

------------------
www.coasterimage.com
Dorney Park Visits in 2003: 2

Very prophetic, I will admit ... and I too like a good arguement - but I give up easily when the other side starts rationalizing ;)

But just come back and let me know so I can get some satisfaction when you come across your first person that is pure-GP that is disappointed ... and I'll get back to you when I find an enthusiast that accepts it as a good game worth the money ;)

------------------
"You know we got a good thing goin and I don't wanna see it end" --Reel Big Fish
-- Brett

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums - ©2024, POP World Media, LLC
Loading...