------------------
This space will forever be dedicated to Hercules-R.I.P. 1989-2003
It's not exactly rare or endangered but it is in short supply and high demand making it pretty expensive (not to mention the ecological value). Was the Beast really built of redwood?
Most of the wood used in construction is Southern Yellow Pine and I don't think it really has much to do with how well a coaster runs - I'm pretty sure most modern wood coasters use this wood.
Many older coasters were probably built with old growth wood that was much stronger then wood available today (because it grew slowly with tightly packed growth rings unlike the "farmed" trees today that are grown as quickly as possible). I've heard this is the reason why Leap the Dips had to have steel put on top of the wooden rails. The restoration used oak rails like the original but modern oak just wasn't as sturdy as the older stuff.
------------------
Ripple Rock Amusement Park
Flying Scooter coming soon!
RideMan said:
Yesterday, Mean Streak was running with the drop trims turned off (I wonder if they rolled the thing back again during testing last week...) and the train went into that curve OK, but as it got to the top of the curve, there was a nasty jolt to the right.--Dave Althoff, Jr.
Dave,
They have been running MS without the drop trims since at least the last of August. We rode it on 8/27 & 9/6 without the trims. The thing I noticed the most was the train didn't jackhammer at the base of the hill and it ran pretty darn good the first half of the ride. Fast and furious like the days of old.
(source: Ollie Lindon, PKI Wood Coaster Maintenance Guy, addressing a tour group in the winter of '96)
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
In regards to Wildcat the ride became very rough around 1999, I believe and then the major re-tracking began.
In regards the any non-trailered (thank god theirs only two coaster still running them) PTCs. If something is wrong with the way they are running (ex. Hercules) it's the most likely track that has the problem.
In regards to the Volvo type high seat backs other than being very uncomfortable there is another issue with them (which I am going to keep my mouth shut about). These seat backs are being fazed out. While they are still available on new cars, they are only used if the park asks for them. The standard is now the padded high seats back like Hershey Park's Wildcat runs.
-----------------
www.alexsplace.com
*** This post was edited by Alex Nagel 9/16/2003 11:41:08 PM ***
Chuck, who may be wrong but I remember the coaster had a reddish tint to it without any stain and there was also alot of talk about the redwood in the coaster back in 1979.
C\
------------------
Charles Nungester.
It's official Lesourdsville Lake is closed for 2003
Are you possibly thinking of European Redwood, which is a form of pine?
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
loriu said:
They have been running MS without the drop trims since at least the last of August. We rode it on 8/27 & 9/6 without the trims.
I believe (but don't quote me on this) they have been running it without trims since it rolled back last. That happened sometime during the second to last week of August if I remember correctly.
------------------
James Draeger
------------------
This space will forever be dedicated to Hercules-R.I.P. 1989-2003
Regardless the thing is running great in the first half without the trims. Significantly smoother if that is possible.
------------------
If I was part of a coaster, I would be an upstop pad on an Arrow Mine Train.
MAGNUM HAD MY BABY!
I sat in the frist seat and it was bad. The frist time I rode in 1995 it had no brakes and went fast.
One thing I do notice on both Eagle and Viper is that the lift chain slows considerably when the train begins to crest the hill. This may help to limit top-end speed by a small amount.
I mean think about it. The notion that the trims on the first hill were added just to keep this ride from "tearing itself apart" and going to the great rollercoaster junk yard in the sky is ridiculous.
------------------
Just when you think you have all the answers, I change the questions
------------------
Be polite and ignore the idiots. - rollergator
"It's not a Toomer" - Arnold Schwartzenkoph
"Those who know don't talk and those who talk don't know." -Jeff
One thign I just thought about is this, look at how "wide" Shivering Timbers is, compare that structure to the mega Dinns.
Sure seems like there is a lot more support structure on ST then the Dinns.
------------------
If I was part of a coaster, I would be an upstop pad on an Arrow Mine Train.
MAGNUM HAD MY BABY!
Draegs, on 9/7 when I rode Mean Streak, the first drop trims were on hard. I mean, this was the Toothchipper going down that first drop. On 9/14, running with the brakes off was a dramatic improvement for the first half of the ride.
MagnumForce, consider also that the tall hill on the Summers/Dinn giant coasters is also given lateral support by the structure for the adjacent track and the structure for the curves. On Mean Streak, for instance, there is that whole structure for the top of the second hill, and that additional structure about half-way up the first hill that supports that track that wraps around the lift. On Shivering Timbers, there is no additional ride segment adjacent to the tall hills, so additional side bracing is probably necessary.
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
First i want to agree with Rideman that the trains seem to be a big problem with Mean Streak. I've always hated them. And as pointed out they do not articulte well. But here's the but, that is just a gut reaction for me, and if the trains are so bad why did it run so well for a year or three when it opened? That would also say to me that the engineering isn't a problem unless it affects the aging of the ride as it runs.
Second there was some talk a little back about shaking and lack of shaking on the ride. It would seem to me that a ride that shakes would make for a better (ie smoother or less shuttling) ride but more of a nightmare for the maintenance. Does that make sense to the rest of you? If that is true then there has to be some ideal equalibrium for each case where shaking creates a comfort=affordability equasion.
Third i've noticed that on the sweeping turned hills of the S/D coasters that the hill (in the case of the MS the second)peaks to late so that the train is nearly out of energy at the end of the turn. It just seems more natural to me that an earlier peak in the first quarter of the turn would make for a smoother/faster turn even if the hill is the same height. I would also go further to say that the second hill of the MS could stand to be lowered a ten foot or two. It would be nice for the ride to have some momentum into the third ( and potentially the best) hill of the ride. It is also painfully appearant on the RWB at WOA where if you look at the nearly identical footprinted Riverview Bobs profile the hills all peak much earlier in the turns.
The other thing i notice odd about MS is that it to me seems to run smoother when faster. But that's just one man's opinion.
In the end i have to wonder if the experts in the field know exactly what's wrong with these notoriously rough rides. Because if they did why not just fix the darn things?
lorilu said the trims have "been off MS since the end of August", but I went on September 6 and 7 and the trims were definitely catching on the first drop when we rode it. As Jeff has said int he past, I think the trims are based upon the weight of the train before.
I certainly do miss the "old" MS from the first two years of operation when it was my favorite coaster in the park (yes, even above Magnum).
------------------
I'd rather die living than live like I'm dead
http://www.webtechnik.com/ebony/CPLady.htm
You must be logged in to post