Which means my track record is around 4000!
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
And also, it's not a coaster!
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
Relocated coasters are just as different as two copies of a clone and are countable. Parallel and mirrored racers fall under the same rule. This rule only applies to "permanent" installations.
New trains don't make for an additional credit unless reversed (or a different riding position).
If you keep your own records you can count any way you please. If the site you use doesn't follow CWA rules report them immediately.
;)
My record sits basically as a range right now, because of the way that racing coasters could be counted. I personally would lean with the following:
--If I rode one side of a racing coaster, then I would claim having ridden the coaster.
--If I rode both sides, I would want to count each side as a separate credit (unless it falls into the KW Racer classification (see above).
So, I think the range is something like 184-192, depending on how you count things.
I don't particularly agree with the relocated coaster counting if there has been no significant changes. To me, it is the same basic coaster, no matter where it's at. With clones, even though they are the same layout, they were created as separate coasters--i.e. separate track, metal, trains, etc. With relocated coasters, there is no new track, trains, etc. in a lot of cases--therefore, it's still the same basic ride, just in a different place. That's kinda along the lines of a travelling coaster, only it has less stops :) *** Edited 6/30/2006 8:01:51 PM UTC by rablat5***
coastin' since 1985
The more ways you count the more mile-stone coaster choices you can have.
-working on 300 again. *** Edited 6/30/2006 8:37:15 PM UTC by boblogone***
Just my two cents.
Rebel Yell and Racer are both older "racing" coasters. And on Rebel Yell, each side has its own queue, and is distinguished by the labels "Forwards" and "Backwards". :) *** Edited 6/30/2006 10:03:10 PM UTC by rablat5***
coastin' since 1985
But I get crap from friends because I count kiddie coasters! I have a 2-year old and a 5-year old, and I'm the primary rider with them, so I count them as a credit.
So Arthur, do what you want, count what you want. It should be for your use anyway. Everybody has their own method for doing counts, including me. *** Edited 6/30/2006 11:02:02 PM UTC by Floorless Fan***
Intamin Fan said:
I can't think of any coasters in which I'm in control of the speed or braking.
I can think of a few, but only one in the U.S. The new (as of last year) alpine coaster at Glenwood Caverns Action Park meets all the criteria of a roller coaster.
It is a full circuit, single car coaster that runs on rails and had a cable lift at the end of the ride to get you back to the station. It is NOT an alpine slide, the cars are attached to the rail. You are in complete control of the speed for all but the lift, station and track immediately before the lift.
It's a fun ride, nothing overly thrilling, but definately worth a try. I just snapped a bunch of photos of it on my trip out to CO last week. I'll hopefully get it added to the track record here when I get around to it.
Racers -- If the experience is markedly different on each side -- 2 credits, otherwise 1 credit. (take separate credits for Rebel Yell, forward and backward)
Steel Phantom and Phantoms Revenge -- major differences (2 credits).
If it can be steered, don't count it at all.
As for other credit collecting other than coasters some good ones are:
Carousels
Drop towers
Water Rides (that you ride in regular clothes)
Darkrides
Arthur Bahl
YES!
Then each side counts as a credit.
In reality,there are 3 racing coasters that only count as a single credit;
Kennywood's Racer
Blackpool's Grand National
Chapultepec's La Montana Rusa(Or whatever it's called).
All of which are mobius loop coasters, and cannot not operate if either side goes down.
My method:
1]If I ride it, I count it.
2]No matter how many tracks it counts only as one.
3]No matter how different each track is it counts only as one.
4]If it is relocated in any manner I do not recount it.
5]If it receives a different running stock, is painted a different color, or placed inside a building I do not recount it.
6]I count only one per model of traveling [carnival] coaster.
7]I do not count new "experiences" i.e. turning a train or cars on a train backwards.
8]If it is 100% powered I do not count it.
With this conservative method I have managed to ride over 425 different coasters.
IMHO so long as one is comfortable with how they count there is no right or wrong.
Anywho, if Space Mountain weren't such a different experience now compared to what it was, didn't have so much updating, didn't have trains that felt noticably different... I would count it as one.
You must be logged in to post