coasterguts said:
Yeah but if the insurance adjusters total a ride, don't they own the ride and the ride is then their ride to do whatever they want to do with it?
I'd imagine it works the same as homeowners insurance...which I've *become* knowledgeable about. When they "total you out", all that means is they pay up to the coverage limit, and then it becomes YOUR problem. The insurance company doesn't take possession, or any further responsibility. But any and all repairs are then between the insured and their contractor(s).
#1 is finding an agency who will sell it to you. Most won't. Not in south Louisiana, and especially south of lake Ponchatrain (which SF is). #2 is that if you find someone who will sell, the price is astronomical.
Now...if a tree or projectile hit something on SF property, I'm sure they are covered. BUt all that stuff sitting in water, be it a building, ride, etc. They're probably not going to get a penny from their insurance provider. SOmeone please correct me if I'm wrong.
$400 annual premium per $100,000 of coverage sounds pretty cheap to me.
Qouth Swoosh
.....It was a category 4 hurricane and the park did not get the blunt of the storm ...
So in addition to causing widespread destruction Katrina was handing out cannabis? That b*tch!
Fate is the path of least resistance.
I think Six Flags may be abandoning that sunken ship though and the city may have to end up dealing with it (as if they don't have enough to deal with!).
New Orleans WILL return, better than ever.
BTW It is possible to get flood insurance in certain areas. I know the Superdome had $100 million in coverage. Hopefully that and federal aid can get the park running again. But in my opinion, ONLY if they get the levee issue fixed. This whole flood issue should have never happened. The surge in the NO area was probably less than a Cat. 3 storm, which is what they CLAIM they can withstand.
*** Edited 9/13/2005 8:00:15 PM UTC by Cameraman***
Cameraman said:
Considering that Six Flags doesn't own SFNO... they won't be running off with any rides or checks. They have the exact same lease agreement as SFMW. The City's Industrial & Development board owns everything, EVEN the new for 2005 rides such as Batman. Look in the SF company prospectus, it's there I swear by it.
Okay, then that means SF is only the management company and it should up to the board as to whether or not the park reopens.
BTW, SF had to dump $25 mil into the park. Who owns the $25 mil worth of attractions they added.
A day at the park is what you make it!
Yeah I'm one of those displaced persons.
I do have a home to go back to though ;) ...eventually.
Cameraman said:
The City's Industrial & Development board owns everything, EVEN the new for 2005 rides such as Batman.
From Six Flags:
We lease, on a long-term basis, the land on which the park is located together with most of the rides and attractions existing at the park.Notice *most* of the rides and attractions. My guess is the new ones - the ones Six Flags purchased - belong to Six Flags.
-Nate
On August 23, 2002, we acquired Jazzland (now Six Flags New Orleans), a theme park located outside New Orleans, for the assumption of $16,820,000 of pre-existing liabilities of the park and aggregate cash payments of $5,415,000.The prior owner of the park had sought protection under the federal bankruptcy laws. We agreed to invest in the park $25,000,000 over the three seasons commencing with 2003. As of December 31, 2004, this obligation was satisfied.
We lease, from the Industrial Development Board of the City of New Orleans, on a long-term basis, the land on which the park is located, together with most of the rides and attractions existing at the park on the acquisition date.
Pursuant to this lease, the Industrial Development Board automatically acquires title to and becomes the owner of all rides, attractions and other leasehold improvements funded with our $25,000,000 investment or with other amounts we invest at the park, subject to all of the terms of the lease. We also own a separate 66-acre parcel available for complementary uses.
So, Batman, Jester and all rides that were in place prior to 12/31/04 (approximately) are property of the Industrial Development Board...not Six Flags. *** Edited 9/14/2005 1:19:39 PM UTC by redman822***
--George H
But at the time, it would appear that they had made a good deal. For a combined $47.2 million ($5.4MM cash, $16.8MM debt and $25MM upgrades) they had a fully operational park. And of that $25MM in upgrades, not much of that was, most likely, in the form of cash as they brought in two used coasters and various flat rides, which if my memory serves right were also located elsewhere previously.
And in fact, checking the old news stories here, $24 million was spent on upgrades before the park opened in 2003...
--George H
You must be logged in to post