Just consider this: SFNJ has a *separately-gated* waterpark.
Or, listen to those people that we KNOW have "insider info". Like AJ for instance... ;)
But are any of them--or all of them combined--sufficient to service a couple billion of amassed debt? That's the real question.
-'Playa
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
I like the direction they're going....if it isn't already too-little-too-late...
Ronman said:
In the world of retail which I work in, it's Christmas 2007. .
You continue doing what you do best being a Walmart greeter and let the experts in the amusement park industry handle the decisions to get the company in the black.
My favorite MJ tune: "Billie Jean" which I have been listening to alot now. RIP MJ.
Ronman is a tool but he knows the right Chicago baseball team.
My favorite MJ tune: "Billie Jean" which I have been listening to alot now. RIP MJ.
Navy Pier needs to get a Woodie, now that would be something.
Kevin Max said:
What rides have "extra large operating costs," and what are these costs?
Besides what's being removed, there is:
Whizzer- maintenance cost due to lack of replacement parts (parts are custom made in house)
Raceway cars- fuel cost and labor cost
loggers run/ yankee clipper- maintenance cost due to age and lack of parts
Roaring Rapids- labor cost and energy costs.
And any of the other attractions that are older and parts are harder to get. That is why the first generation Intamin free-falls have been removed across the country and sky whirl was removed when they installed DV.
Where are the Whizzer buttons or tees? How about the 'come ride the classic Whizzer' commercial?
Think outside the corporate box. Other things do work. Better than the "I'm huge in japan" shirts.....
otterkpr said:
Kevin Max said:
What rides have "extra large operating costs," and what are these costs?Besides what's being removed, there is:
Whizzer- maintenance cost due to lack of replacement parts (parts are custom made in house)
Raceway cars- fuel cost and labor cost
loggers run/ yankee clipper- maintenance cost due to age and lack of parts
Roaring Rapids- labor cost and energy costs.
And any of the other attractions that are older and parts are harder to get.
These rides could be taken out in the coming future (besides the ones you mentioned) because they are really "old": Fiddler's Fling, Ricochet, Triple Play, Sky Trek Tower, Hometown Fun Machine, Rue Le Dodge, Demon, Columbia Carousel, The Orbit, East River Crawler, and the Condor is aging. That's a lot of stuff.
Giant Drop could be taken out because many people don't like it anymore, and everyone knows how great Jester's Wild Ride is.
People go to malls to shop for clothing, food, basic necessities of life. They're generally open 363 days a year--unless there's a movie theater, in which case you can say 365. Much longer than most any theme park.
If your "thinking" was correct, I suppose SFA, BGA, USF, USH, IOA, KBF, SFOT, SFMM and of course Disneyland and WDW should be paved over, too. After all, each and every one of them gets outdrawn by a mall.
But somehow, I don't think they're worried.
-CO
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
CoastaPlaya said:
Earth to genius?
Looking for genius in this thread is like ordering a porterhouse at a 7-11.
Is that a cee-gar or a cigarette?
-CO
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
Sure, parts are hard to come by for older rides, but the FAMILY value in those is...well, irreplaceable. Dark Knights will be busy, no doubt, but they won't maintain the consistent drawing power of those old Schwarzkops...
matt. said:
CoastaPlaya said:
Earth to genius?Looking for genius in this thread is like ordering a porterhouse at a 7-11.
Well said.
Somewhere along the line, this thread went from an interesting opinion thread to a random conjecture thread based on stating things that (unless I missed it), aren't public knowledge like the attendance levels of the Six Flags parks (We know the chain, not parks -- right?), cost of rides and so on.
All things considering, the management team in charge of the parks seems to have done a fine job so far, and the parks which I have been to have all showed major improvements. I tend to trust them until proved otherwise. If next year's rides suck and guests don't come, then I'll probably look differently -- but all of the additions (and subtractions) so far have been fine by me.
But then again, I don't go to the park expecting to ride a new "B@M" coaster every year. Heck, I'm fine with going and not riding any roller coasters and just enjoying the rest of the park, something which has been made much easier since Shapiro took over.
--
Rollergator, interesting comment, but I have to disagree at least a bit. The Dark Knight rides may or may not end up as classics -- I don't think that it is easy to tell what will become a nostalgic ride before suddenly one day it is. The original Batman at Great America is a great example. I remember going to the park in 1992, and the ride was HUGELY popular and the park was constantly packed.
When I stopped this year, Batman had a decent sized line for it. Sure, it wasn't as big as it was in 1992, but it was definitely bigger than most of the rides there. Next year, Batman will be 16 years old. At this point, you can't say the ride is "wearing off" and will get less popular in the future years. It has remained an amazingly popular ride.
Add to this the fact that those who are riding it for the first time now were probably not alive when the ride was built, and they can talk with their parents who can remember their first trip on it when they were younger (a 12 year old could have a parent who was 16 when they first rode, and that parent would now be 31), and it's just about there.
On the other hand, Iron Wolf at the same park was a complete walk on the day that I was there. It's older, but it is definitely *not* a classic ride.
I'm waiting to pass all judgment on the Dark Knight rides. They might be amazing that I'll want to ride again and again, and they might be complete junk that I will ride one and then skip the other ones next year. We'll see.
You must be logged in to post