May have something to do with weather getting colder once the sun goes down and all.
Just an observation...
-CO
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
Haven't ridden Niquil at SFGAdv, eh? ;-)
If SF Great America is going to bring a whole new light and have a better collection of coasters than, say, Cedar Point, then a new, different style of coaster needs to be developed.
When one is, Great America may want to look at it, since the park already has many "firsts." B&M's Iron Wolf was the company's first coaster, and it was also a pioneer for stand-ups like it. Oh, and Batman: The Ride was the first of its kind, achieving landmark status from ACE in June 2005.
Some of these "firsts" may not be the tallest or fastest of their kind, but they still are the originators. Take Raging Bull, the first hypercoaster of its kind, for example, in comparison to Apollo's Chariot in Busch Gardens, VA. They are different rides and track layouts. The difference, which makes Apollo have AN edge, not THE edge, is the scenery and hills. Raging Bull gives riders a great view of the park, the highway and Hurricane Harbor all in one. Apollo's Chariot runs through forestry and such, which may take riders into their own world and away from the rest of the park. Great America already has a coaster in the trees; it's called Whizzer.
But Raging Bull is no kid sister to Apollo's Chariot. They both came out around the same time, have a comparable first drop and are some of the parks' biggest draws.
Maybe Great America needs the "Mouse in a Box" to ensure that the park doesn't fall into hokey territory with recycled rides and coasters that other parks have worn out of popularity long before.
Great America has been a staple for the Midwest because of its variety of their coaster collection, not for holding the record for biggest and best coasters forever. (I still see no reason the legendary Shock Wave needed to be replaced, though I agree Superman: Ultimate Flight's pretzel loop is a staple or the ride, as well as the entire park, along with Raging Bull's drop.)
If I lived near Cedar Point and wouldn't have to take off work, pay for a hotel, pay for tickets (is one day enough?) and still spend more money, of course that would be the place to be. But being that I live in Chicagoland, work full-time, don't know anyone in Ohio and am not extremely wealthy enough to vacation there for that sole purpose, I am content with my season pass to Great America. And I live an hour away.
How many people have the necessary means to shun Six Flags Great America just to visit another park with no other intentions?
Would we in Chicagoland accept coasters like X or Top Thrill Dragster? Of course we would! But we'd rather be known for being innovators, not followers.
The Flying Turns makes all the right people wet - Gonch
The Deja-Vu's were removed to make room at the parks. SF California will be staying. The European model in operation is running fine. The one that was sold will have a great home.
FYI, Great Adventure is the company cash-cow, and policy setter. SF Chicago is a huge player in the company, but they will always be #2.
As for policies, each park tries out different things. They see what works and what doesn't and end it or expand it. Thats the advantage of having a family of parks, you can be testing things out all the time. I wouldn't give SFGAd the title of setting all the policies, as it is shared throughout the chain.
For estimates, SFGAm is 2.7 million in attendance, and I'm going to guess that SFStL is 1.5 million. Let's say that more people go 5 times to SFGAm on there season pass, and SFStL, they only go 2 times. If that was the case, it's almost like they aren't getting much money from those people with the season pass, and SFStL could be making more money. Those people with season passes DON'T have to spend any extra money on the park. The season pass inflates attendance.
You must be logged in to post