But I'm sure people will just go past it, considering my home park is SFA and the entire park is full of punk's that don't follow the rules as it is already.
*** Edited 1/19/2006 8:20:50 PM UTC by Colin Fisher***
Now the funny thing is that tobacco companies are not fighting these bans with the millions of dollars that they pump into political action committees to influence laws. I mean if you want to sell more of your product wouldn't you think you would fight against the things that could cost you a lot of profits? I guess they have decided that their product has addicted enough people and they don't need to be addicting more people.
Yes I agree with the people who smoke and say it is hard to quit.
I also agree with the asthmatic who says it will affect them if you smoke near them in line. On a midway they can walk to a different area of the midway but in a line they are stuck where they are.
What's worse about PKD's system is if you look on the map for the designated area,then actually try to find it you find that in most cases the maps are incorrectly showing the designated area....the easiest one to find is the one over by FOF.
Since paramount implimented the rule just last season there's no way to know for sure if it'll be in place this year,they might've gotten such a negative reaction from smokers who chose to leave the park or not patronize it at all that created a loss of revenue which couldn't easily be offset by the number of non smokers entering the gates.
About confronting smokers in ride queues I wouldn't recomend it,I did so last season & nearly got into a huge fight over it with someone in the Batwing queue.
Also, regardless of the "ethics" behind the issue, if it's a business decision and it makes the park a profit, then who can complain? There aren't many corporations who do things because they're right and not because they're profitable. (Which is sad in it's own way).
Vote with your money and your trip to guest relations.
*** Edited 1/19/2006 8:44:56 PM UTC by ApolloAndy***
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
delan said:
Lord Gonchar, are you staying out of this one?
Is it that obvious? :)
Chuck, a smoker, Who has no problem with this policy if enough areas are provided.
BATWING FAN SFA said:
About confronting smokers in ride queues I wouldn't recomend it,I did so last season & nearly got into a huge fight over it with someone in the Batwing queue.
I've actually had fairly pleasant/neutral experiences asking people to stop. The problem is that even if there are 20 people who are really pissed off about the smoke, none of them will say anything because they don't want to cause trouble. I figure I'm just going to be the one to speak up for the 20.
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
In the case of Chicago, ONE elected offical voted nay to the smoking ban. I think it was 49-1.
I would have to disagree with the notion that tobacco companies feel they have enough addicted people and don't need to add more.
On a humerous note, if Six Flags implements a "No re-entry" policy and a "no smoking" policy, I'd have to bet you'll see a bunch of us smokers WIDE EYED, shaking, and pretty much going insane.
nick smith
I also agree highly with this policy, as long as there are designated smoking areas outside of the main paths and childrens areas. The last thing I want to do while waiting in line, or sitting eating is breath someone elses smoke.
:)
I've never really had a problem with smokers in line at any amusement park let alone a Six Flags. Most smokers are polite enough to police themselves and contain their smoking to an area where it won't bother other people instead of firing one up in line.
If the whole park goes smoke-free that is kinda rediculous IMO. Give 'em a break and create a smoking area off to the side that's convienently located in several areas of the park and that'll be fine with me. It just seems to be a bit over the top to say no smoking throughout the entire park. (once again IMO )
btw, I'm not a smoker. Just a person that hates seeing anyones freedoms taken away at a place where your supposed to be able to relax and have fun.
"Designating specific smoking zones will allow for a cleaner, friendlier park atmosphere where families can enjoy spending their day."
And that seems fair to me. At most parks, it's the opposite: smoking with a few non-smoking zones that aren't well enforced.
Walt Schmidt - Co-Publisher, PointBuzz
Hey, I can do that, too! I want to shoot you, so deal with it. I want to grab your head and fart on it, so deal with it. I want to look your girlfriend up and down, so deal with it.
It's a lot of fun, isn't it?
Apparently it is a lot of fun. :)
(I tried, I really did. Sigh.)
The only time the smoking areas bother me is when parents have their kids sitting in it with them. *** Edited 1/19/2006 11:25:03 PM UTC by GoliathKills***
It's just a matter of people thinking that the only person that matters is themselves.
My thoughts exactly.
The first thing I did when this thread was started was to make sure they were going to have these areas. Could you imagine if they said no smoking in the park period, and you can't re-enter. Now that would ruffle my feathers enough to blow smoke right into the guest relations booth. But it doesn't appear that I will have to resort to that. ;)
I have no problem with companies choosing to go no-smoking. I DO have a problem with cities, municipalities, counties, etc... that impose a smoking ban on independant businesses. If I own a bar, and I want it to be a smoking establishment, then it should be. I have a problem with government telling me that I can't even smoke in my own building.
Mike, the 2-packs a week smoker and just fine with it
You must be logged in to post