Intamin coming to SFWoA???

---

HurricaneGeauga said:
And there's even lots of idle land where the race track used to be. So they have tons of land left.

---

Race track? I've never given SeaWorld a good look, there used to be a race track over there? Hmm, maybe they will add a new Go Kart track :)
Anyway, what is the old race track?

-------------
Got a problem with RWB? you've got a problem with me! Rollercoasters are the secret of life!
http://www.woodencoaster.com

If there was a racetrack over on the SeaWorld side, why the heck are the neighbors complaining about a rollercoaster being built?!

-------------
Benjamin Jones | Yet another coaster-craving yuppie

The land clearing just over the boardwalk is for a ride. the CASINO! Not a new coaster. I didnt see any Intamin track yesterday when I was there.

-------------
www.SFWoA.com Your Connection to SFWoA!

first off the race track was by the wild rides parking lot. It is where thistledown used to be. Funtime never owned it, and it was a long time a go, way before i was born. You can see a sign for it if you drive on Rt. 43. There'll be a dirt road, that is where it was located.

-------------
HurricaneGeauga- Just in case

This is getting out of control. The fact of the matter is that the report on coasternet isn't true. Sorry CoasterBGW, Their isn't any Intamin track at the park besides Superman: Ultimate Escape, and construction has not begun on the 2002 hypercoaster.

-------------
Jes
Webmaster, Jes's Roller Coasters
www.jesms.cjb.net "Thank You Jeff Putz"

Just because MF is 300ft, doesn't mean SFWOA can't build a better one at 200ft. Sure the height and speed of MF couldn't be matched, but how about airtime, smoke filled tunnels, a 90 degree drop and some *actual* theming? Not to mention, excellent terrain...

-------------
I'd like a tall CCI out and back, and a grande nonfat Latte to go please! *** This post was edited by DWeaver on 8/10/2001. ***

zero g said that it will be a chance morgan at around 250 feet.


Dont they have a height limit of 200 feet

---

StealthmF5m3 said:
"Now why could SFWoA had a Intamin hyper when CP already has one that is 100 feet taller?
"

---

Lets all think about this. Anyone who is using "CP has an Intamin Giga already, why would SFWoA want an Intamin Hyper?" for reasoning on why they won't get it, listen to me for a minute.

So what? Do you really think the GP knows that MF is Intamin? Probably not, and if they do, I doubt they care. So, if an Intamin Hyper was built at SFWoA, how many would say "I'm not going to Six Flags, because Millennium Force is bigger, built by the same company, and the park has more rollercoasters!"? I bet less than 2 would say that, probably less than 1.
That would be like deciding to goto CP because they have Corkscrew, which has 3 inversions and is an Arrow, instead of going to SFWoA because they only have an Arrow with 2 inversions.

Also, I'm sure a couple of you think that it won't be them becuase they already have a near-hyper height Intamin. Who cares? Look at the park right now, they already have 3 Vekoma coasters, so why would they not want 2? Most parks with a large selection of coasters have many built by the same company, look at CP, Corkscrew & Magnum, Mantis & Raptor. Being built by Intamin would in no way stop SFWoA from buying a Hyper from them.

-------------
Do your own homework!

TrBiggar's words in italics
Do you really think the GP knows that MF is Intamin?
No, and they likely dont care either

So, if an Intamin Hyper was built at SFWoA, how many would say "I'm not going to Six Flags, because Millennium Force is bigger, built by the same company, and the park has more rollercoasters!"? I bet less than 2 would say that, probably less than 1.

I disagree with you here. A lot of people would say that very thing. Heck, I was with a family of ACErs earlier this year @ SFA and the dad was like (referring to S:ROS) "Yeah this is good, but it's not as tall as MForce". So if even so-called 'enthusiasts' get caught up on heights, why not most people?

That would be like deciding to goto CP because they have Corkscrew, which has 3 inversions and is an Arrow, instead of going to SFWoA because they only have an Arrow with 2 inversions.

And I'm sure that back in the day, people did exactly that. I know people that go to SFGAm who like Shockwave more than Demon because it is higher/faster/loopier. Also, most people in the Chi area go to SFGAm over say Santa's Village and KiddieLand because SFGAm has more coasters!

With that being said, SFWoA could get any coaster they wanted, Intamin or otherwise. But I *do* think it will be a CMC.
jeremy
-------------
"Nobody writes about the planes that land." Steve Salerno Washington Times 7-10-01

I hate Thistledown, I lived right down the street from it, and every time we got on the highway Sniff Snifff, awwwwwwww man those horses reeked. Why are they building a casino, i thought GAmbling was Illegal in Ohio.
-------------
The only good wolverine is a dead wolverine! Ohio State Football. go Bucks

A casino is a flat ride.

-------------
Got a problem with RWB? you've got a problem with me! Rollercoasters are the secret of life!
http://www.woodencoaster.com

---

StealthmF5m3 said:
"

---

NitroExplodes said:
"I agree with Coastercraver. CP needs to stop breaking records, and get good rides.

-------------
Nitro: The Most Explosive Coaster on the Planet explodes at Six Flags Great Adventure in 2001."

---

Um... CP has good rides. You haven't been there and why are you saying that CP needs to build good rides?

A record breaker is an awesome ride - **COUGH**Millennium Force**COUGH**

Why are you such a smart ass?!?!