How many more will be taken away?

What I meant by that is if two parks close together marketed two new coasters in one year - one being a 95' tall wooden twister and one being a 280' steelie with an 80 degree drop and 10 loops, the public will go ga-ga for the tall looper, and say "that's dinky!" to the woodie. Now would the woodie provide a better ride? If it was a GCI, I'd say almost definitely! But that's not how the public who doesn't know a GCI from a CCI or a Dinn or an Intamin will percieve it.

------------------
Brett
Resident Launch Whore

rough, beat-the-hell-outta-ya rollercoasters are unwelcome with the coaster enthusiasts I hang out with. There is The Beast rough, where it shakes and rattles you and you get off with an adrenaline rush cuz you thought you were gonna die (the fun kind) and then theres the bone-rattling, joint-popping, back-braking, migraine inducing shakes and ratlles like the SoB and Mean Streak.

No matter how many times i go from one to another and try to figure out why one rough hurts and the other is pure enjoyment, i cant figure it out. Seems to be the coaster that causes it. Poor design, bad maintainance, who knows. but those painful rough coasters can be burnt to the ground for all I care.

Ive never ridden Hurcules, but if it falls under the category of painful rough, then goodbye!


CrAzedFaNaTiC said:
Guess what, SFGAm isn't going to tear it up because you don't like it.

But if enough people don't like it they will.

Remember the coaster formerly known as Shockwave?

I have to disagree with the thing about steepies bringing in more attention. The GP is ever more knowledgable today, as most ofmy friends know where boulderdash, raven, ttd, and the bunch are. I mean a floorless will attract attention, but look what rides like Raven, Boulderdash, and Shivering Timbers did for the parks. The parks went from small hometown parks to nationally known thrill centers in no time.

------------------
Boulderdashdashdash

Everybody swears that woodies cannot bring in people. As nightride said, parks have enhanced their reputations big-time, by adding a top wooden coaster. If wood doesn't bring in $$, then how do Lake Compounce, Silverwood, Holiday World, Indiana Beach, Knoebels, and countless other parks survive when their #1 attraction(s) are wooden???

People may go crazy over the big, fast, multiple inversion coaster with unique seating methods, but most people will try to go on every coaster. It may just be that "dinky" old woodie that makes the best impression on them, and you can bet they will return and ride it again.

And regarding Hercules, I think it will turn out to be a great move, people will love the floorless, just like they love Talon. If a ride just can't deliver any more, then I see no reason why it should stay.
*** This post was edited by CoasterFan4Life 9/5/2003 3:23:55 PM ***


CoasterFan4Life said:


And regarding Hercules, I think it will turn out to be a great move, people will love the floorless, just like they love Talon. If a ride just can't deliver any more, then I see no reason why it should stay.


I just don't feel as though they are giving the ride a chance. Taking the ride down should be the very last resort thing. I feel as though all they did was pump "millions" of dollars into maintaining Hercules' current condition rather than pumping millions of dollars into reprofiling it or altering it into a great ride.
------------------
This space will forever be dedicated to Hercules-R.I.P. 1989-2003


rollergator's avatar

CoasterFan4Life said:
If wood doesn't bring in $$, then how do Lake Compounce, Silverwood, Holiday World, Indiana Beach, Knoebels, and countless other parks survive when their #1 attraction(s) are wooden???

Just a small note, not that I'm disagreeing *at all*....this list SEEMS to me to be a regular "Who's who in wooden coaster MAINTENANCE"....I can't help but think that if these same *rides* were put in parks where they weren't being painstakingly cared for, that they wouldn't be half the draw that they ARE for their respective parks....;)

Yes Hercules is rough. Yes I thought that it was a painful ride. Am I sad to see it go, yes, but I am not happy either. I just hope that the floorless that goes in is as unique as it sounds. While having five tunnels like I read it is supposed to have will be cool if the inversions are the same as many other B&M's I won't rush to ride it. Hercules is the only exception to my rule of not removing a coaster. I never saw a full train leave the station on that ride.

Personally I feel that any lost coaster is a terrible loss. I would hate to see Cedar Point take out Mean Streak. While it is not a smooth ride it does not cause me any pain. I don't feel SoB overly rough. I rode Steel Phantom on the last day of operation and I still found it a great ride (a better ride now). I rode Shockwave and found it to be fun but it was also replaced by a better ride.

I guess what I am trying to say is if a coaster must be torn down, I hope it is replaced by a better ride. Like Phantom, KC, Shockwave, and hopefully Hercules. Not like Drachen Fire. I understand that this was not only the most unique arrow looper ever built but also not the roughest one out there.

On another note I wish so called enthuisiasts would stop complaining about a ride they don't like. If you don't find a coaster enjoyable don't ride it. I don't find any Vekoma enjoyable so I don't ride them more than once. I don't wine to park management to have it removed because I didn't like it. I didn't think Lightning Racer was a great ride but I don't think it should be removed. Just remember if people complain enough about a ride it will get removed. You wouldn't want your favorite coaster removed.


MagnumForce said:
Rough?

Thats not ough, that is a lousy piece of enginering.

You are talkign to a person who holds wooden coasters in a much much much much higher regard then any steelie except for Magnum.

Magnum is rather rough at times but the ride more then makes up for it, same goes for Timbers, Twister, Beast, etc, hell even LoCoSuMo which is VEY rough. Oh yeah and I am a sucker for Arrow Loopers.

Hercules is a plain and simple peice of crap whose roughness is only partially responsible with the fact that its a total and complete POS.

One ride on that thing makes Mean Streak feel like a ide on Legend.

------------------
If given the choice I'd choose a hamburger over a hotdog anyday of the week.

THANK YOU BRENT!!!

i too hold woodie's in a much higher regard than steel coasters and after riding hercules in 2001 i walked away saying it was the worst wooden rollercoaster i have ever experienced. i have since then rode the boss at six flags st. louis and it rivals hercules for that position.

pure and simple: hercules was horribly engineered and performed very poorly....but i will say that when i first saw the ride it had me drooling because of how beautiful the first drop and rest of the layout is. truly fascinating design, truly horrible execution of design.

i hope some of you guys keep mourning the loss of hercules while i continue to enjoy rides on quality wooden coasters.

------------------
seek first to understand
then to be understood



No matter how much enthusiasts like wooden coasters, no wooden coaster that is built right and is actually a good ride will bring in the bucks like a big old Beemer or Intamin. The things that get people's attention and keep 'em comin back is height, speed, and loops.

OMG..:rolls eyes: I couldn't disagree with that statement more. Maybe that's how YOU feel, but that is not how the average guest feels. In fact, most woodies hold the interest level up over the long haul much better then a steel ride does. People get bored of most steel long before they tire of a woodie. And one look to rides like Space Mtn and Matterhorn prove that even among steel rides, it's not about height, speed, or loops....it's the quality of the ride!

Who in the HELL is Jeff Hammersly?
------------------
I am not who you think I am.
Rollergator, very good point...

Even though (insert big chain known for poor care for woodies here) may not take as much pride in a wood coaster like those parks would, I'd still rather a great ride, that only gives good rides due to poor maintenance, than an average or below-average ride giving downright horrible rides. Maybe, just maybe, if (same big chain) installed a woodie of high caliber, they would make an effort to take better care of it...maybe just wishful thinking, though ;)

I think the decision was based on saving more cash than anything else.
This hasn't made it into the international "coaster scene" yet, but add to that list that Dreamworld's infamous Thunderbolt, as of August is SBNO and awaiting deconstruction to make way for a 2005 thrill ride. They've suggested that the ride has been sold to someone else - you've really got to feel sorry for the poor park that's allegedly bought it. I think if Hercules is exactly how not to do a wooden coaster, then Thunderbolt is the steel coaster example; and like Hercules, it won't be missed.

------------------
Total Thrills Amusement Guide
Australia's Premier Source for Thrills!


auscoasterman said:
I think if Hercules is exactly how not to do a wooden coaster, then Thunderbolt is the steel coaster example; and like Hercules, it won't be missed.

Speak for yourself. I'll miss Hercules and I know many others that will also. Have you ever even been on the ride? If not, how would you know to make such an assumption.

------------------
This space will forever be dedicated to Hercules-R.I.P. 1989-2003

Jeff Hammersley is the head of coaster maintainance at Holiday Wold and a former CCI engineer and designer.

------------------
If given the choice I'd choose a hamburger over a hotdog anyday of the week.

Mamoosh's avatar
IIRC Hammersley also worked on the two outstanding Silverwoodies.

mOOSH

------------------
2004 Coaster Calendar now available. Order in advance and save. See S&D Greetings for details.

nasai's avatar

MagnumForce said:
Rough? Thats not rough, that is a lousy piece of enginering.

Brent, I wouldn't really call Iron Wolf lousy engineering. If anything, it's brilliant engineering. However, it's WAY too much, and WAY overambitious given it's very small footprint, and the fact that it's a standup. If you put floorless cars on that track, you'd praise the day you were born, and you know it. Same goes for Mantis. Those earlier standups were just built too tight IMHO for a person (with ears) standing up.

My 2 cents. :)
------------------
Rob - Jerk/Loser - Standing up for the unfunny and unattractive. - Click here for details

That comment was directed at Herc, Rob. Iron Wolf isn't terrible enginnering, just the nature of the beast. Well actually if thats the case maybe it is bad enginneering, it seems the standus woudl have been designed with a lot higher center of gravity then they were.

------------------
If given the choice I'd choose a hamburger over a hotdog anyday of the week.

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums - ©2024, POP World Media, LLC
Loading...