Posted
Amusement Business reported November 5 that Heide Park will build a 412 ft. tall Intamin roller coaster. The coaster has not been named.
I don't care about if Cedar Point will beat this or Magic Mountain will beat that - I personally hope that a no-name U.S. park builds the first U.S. 400 ft. lift-hill rollercoaster so that all these people can shut their traps. Thank you Heide Park for taking us rollercoaster enthusiasts to a whole new level at a fast pace. I'm pretty sure that many people will enjoy this coaster in the future. But I not sure if people will be intimidated be it's enormous size first. . .
-----------------
My place
http://pages.prodigy.net/dominguezgarage
Also, I would like to make a small comment on why I prefer CP to SF........(Im not trying to start a fight..this is just MY opinion) but SF does not have a Parent Swap program and that really sucks for those of us who love coasters but have to take our kids along with us. It's very inconvenient and that is the reason why I never go to SF. There is no reason why SF shouldn't have this type of feature. For those of you who are not familiar with the Parent Swap~it's when you get a pink slip from CP and someone from your group waits in line for a ride and someone else waits with the kids. When that person rides the ride they give the pink slip to a ride op and goes down the exit. The person (s) waiting with the kids then walk up the exit and ride the ride. That way you don't have to wait in line TWICE! SF doesn't have this feature. (atleast not SFWA). So that is why I don't like those parks. I hope my opinion doesn't anger anyone but like I said-it's MY opinion.
Thanks!
-------------
Go Full Force
www.angelfire.com/my/cramb
Liz
-------------
"The only real limit to height is what people are willing to get on." - Ron Toomer
I went back and looked at the webpage that BMCoaster referenced a few days ago, and noticed that for 2002 it appears that they may be getting some kind of freefall ride that is suppose to be at a height of 105 Meters, which is around 345 feet. The english version (which is the one that BMCoaster posted) says "using the panoramic ride" so I'm not sure if they mean that ride is there now, and they are going to add this free-fall ride onto it, or if they plan on building a 345 foot tall tower with an observation deck on top of it. Since I've never been to the park, I have no idea what is there. It also says that this has yet to be confirmed by the park.
Anyway, I found the exact same page written in German.
Looking at the same text on this page, it says
De achtbaan zou een top van 170 km/h halen, de hoogste achtbaan ter wereld worden, met hills van wel 60m hoog!
Which, translates on the English side to
This rollercoaster will be the heighest in the world, with hills of 60m heigh, and a top speed of 170 km/h.
So, I wonder if we all got mixed up here. From what I'm reading, they are not getting a 412 foot tall coaster, but possibly a 350 foot drop tower, and a 196.85 foot roller coaster.
Of course, I've not read the article in Amusement Business, so again, I could be wrong. But, now I've seen two webpages that show this figure. So, either the initial german page was incorrect in their statement, and then was incorrectly translated into english (or the other way around), or amusement business is wrong.
Again, I'm not trying to point fingers at anyone, just going by what I've found so far.
Thanks in advance if anyone can clear up this matter for me, and let me know who is right on this one.
--Brian
-----------------
Brian A. Plencner
E-Mail: saurses@home.com
Greetings from Hamburg, Germany *** This post was edited by TheGerman on 11/30/2001. ***
You must be logged in to post