Posted
A mother was asked to leave the wading pool at Six Flags Great America while breastfeeding, citing health concerns. If found true, the request would violate Illinois law.
Read more from The Chicago Tribune.
Let's see...milk from the breast or piss from the ____. Which would I prefer to swim in?
1) Incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs:
2) Debating 'health issues' with a breastfeeding mom in a kiddie pool while children standing in it three feet away fill their diapers.
-CO
Crap and pool water do all the time--whether or not you're aware of it.
Women do it in Minnestoa too: In restaurants, at the mall, other places. 75 percent of the time, you won't even notice. Nobody's obligated to stare at the woman's appendages. Just move along.
Ask enough of the missus' friends. I'm sure you'll find at least one to slap ya. ;)
-'Playa
What year is this?
Should you be able to blow your nose in public?
I, for one, report it to PKI Security if I see someone nursing anywhere other than the kiddieland areas. And more than once, I've seen it dealt with. I.E asked to go to Hanna-Barbera or the infant care building.
And for those of you who thinks breastfeeding should be confined to bathroom/locker rooms, I dare *YOU* to have *YOUR* lunch in a locker/bathroom.
The real heath concern here was for the baby. Eating around all those nasty people in the pool....:)
The women I know that breastfed in public always did it in a very polite way. Throwing a blanket over the activity (or a towel if we're at the pool), both for their own privacy and so those around aren't made uncomfortable. Thankfully, this lady was polite. But the law doesn't require you to be, and I think that's where the law needs to be changed.
*** This post was edited by Blaster_1578 7/15/2005 11:40:47 AM ***
If the mother was bottle-feeding the infant in the water and was told that she couldn't do that in the water (I'm assuming that the park does not allow folks to take food and drinks into the water) I don't think it would have created any kind of uproar. It certainly wouldn't have made it to the paper a month later.
I think that's the distinction here.
You must be logged in to post