kpjb said:
I've always wondered why people don't like it when coasters are given the same name, but have no issue with similarly named flat rides.
No one complains about Scramblers, Tilt-A-Whirls, Whips, Ferris Wheels, Enterprises, Pirates, etc.
I have no problems with multiple parks naming their coasters "Roller Coaster."
What would you think about multiple "Maxx Airs," "Sky Hawks," etc?
This Isn't A Hospital--It's An Insane Asylum!
Maxx Air sounds like a character in an amusement park porn film.
"Did somebody say they needed their lap bar checked?"
13 Boomerang, 9 SLC, and 8 B-TR clones
Maude: "You can imagine where it goes from here."
Dude: "He checks the lapbar?"
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
I like it when parks retheme their flat rides, but dont have a huge problem when they dont...
My all time favorite rethemed/renamed mundane flat ride, was the Sportland Pier Hell Hole (Rotor)
http://www.angelfire.com/nj/wwbysea/SPORTLAND/hellhole.htm
Don't worry it's not one of those Angelfire links with a billion pop up ads.. it's a legit Wildwood site.
rollergator said:
I understand the persistent need to classify. I mean, I understand that it exists....I do not understand why people care so much.
Because they have OCD and need to organize everything. I think the debate settled at hybrid, though it's unsettling to have to create a third category. They LOOK like they're wooden but have steel tracks. Then again the opposite is true for Comet at Great Escape, which has a wooden track with steel supports that are designed to look like wooden supports.
My point is the materials used do make a difference.
You must be logged in to post