Let me being by saying this "sucks" and "rules" crap has to go. I'm not even going to issue warnings about it anymore. This isn't a playground or an athletic competition.
I knew it wouldn't take long for someone to bring up Cedar Point. However, as usual, Cedar Point has absolutely nothing to do with the issue at hand. Cedar Point hasn't issued a press release since Lighthouse point. The press they've had lately was generated by the press, not the park.
The Anti-Rumor: You too, are treading on thin ice my friend. Don't insult people you don't know. If you disagree, that's fine, explain why and make your point. If you get personal, you can go away. You have absolutely no idea what education or experience members of this forum have.
The fact of the matter is I've talked to a broker about PKS, and he was of the strong opinion that their debt load was too high given the fact that the amusement industry can be touch and go due to weather and a "roller coaster" economy. I tend to believe the person that I trust to ensure I can retire early.
That aside, if it means more bang for my buck at SFO, so be it, I'm all for it. I certainly don't want them to fail, but the company is spending money like a dot-com in 1998. We know where all of those companies are now. That in the long run isn't good for any of us.
For once, just once, can we have a discussion that doesn't involve Cedar Point, personal insults or enflamed passions that make for a non-intelligent and uninteresting read?
-------------
Jeff
Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com