Has B&M fallen off

Mark W. Baruth

Saturday, July 13, 2002 1:18 PM
Companies build clones because parks ask for them. Not a terribly hard concept to grasp, is it?

-----------------
No love for the whiners

+0

rcthemepark36

Saturday, July 13, 2002 1:29 PM
I think we are just looking for things to complain about. No one has been real critical of B&M's until recently. It's as if we're getting restless and are looking for things to complain about.

-----------------
06/11/02
Photos from Six Flags Worlds Of Adventure were added plus some other small updates:
http://www.angelfire.com/extreme2/rollercoaster2/index.html

+0

rentzy387

Saturday, July 13, 2002 1:38 PM
I expect coasters to get a little rougher with age. I noticed that when I recently rode Medusa. It isn't HORRIBLE, but it is a little bumpy. And yes TiggerMan, Nitro is a little bumpy. I think it's just because it reaches such high speeds. It is still smooth but there are a few spots that rattle a little. Like I said though, very rough B&M coasters are usually old. I was a little suprised when I rode the NEW Batman: The Dark Knight at SFNE. It's new but it's rougher than any other B&M I've ridden. Don't get me wrong though. B&M has made some incredible rides. I just think they aren't perfect.
+0

coasterpunk

Saturday, July 13, 2002 2:00 PM

B&M builds what parks want. I don't think parks just say we want an inverted coaster in this section of land build us one. I think the park decides on how intense of a ride and number on inversions they want, then B&M will give them several layouts to pick from. I could be wrong though.

As for the roughness I agree most of the problem could just be worn wheels and minor matainance.

-----------------
Knoebels visits in 2002. 6

+0

2Hostyl

Saturday, July 13, 2002 2:10 PM

rcthemepark36 said:
"I'll take Lightning Racer over any CCI."

Just so everyone is clear, I wont go *THAT* far. The Legend is still the top woodie in my book, but Lighting Racer *is* second :)

And if you all think NITRO, Raging Bull, Kraken, Medusa are getting bumpy, wait till you get a ride on S:ROS@SFA or Poltergeist, or GASM-II. You'll be BEGGING for that B&M smoothness (if you're into that sort of thing).
lata,
jeremy
--who believes that all things being equal, only Hypersonic has the potential of beeing as smooth as NITRO et al.

+0

coasterrod

Saturday, July 13, 2002 2:12 PM
Have we all forgotten Talon?
+0

Teenage Ninja

Saturday, July 13, 2002 3:06 PM
As I said before a little few bumps aren't going to hurt a ride at all, its a little unsmooth, but I mean it isn't Arrow Multi-Looper bad.

-----------------
Can we change the name of Top Gun to your mom so no one wants to ride your mom?

+0

I-Nar

Saturday, July 13, 2002 3:16 PM

And think about it. As far as loopers are concerned, what company can you compare B&M to? Arrow? Their multi-loopers are nearly unridable compared to B&M's (sans Tennessee Tornado). Intamin? There aren't many Intamin looping coasters. Vekoma? No.

As far as looping coasters are concerned, B&M is the hands-down winner. Some think they produce forceless rides, which isn't true, but when you consider the alternative, there's no way they can be beat.

I consider Shockwave at SFGAm to be one of the most forceful, intense looping coasters I've ever ridden.

I HATE Shockwave to no end. There is nothing (sans the drop) good about that ride.

Edit to say: By the way, isn't it the fault of the park if the coaster shakes a little bit in the inversions/turns? I mean, it isn't a big problem, but their repair schedule, and inspection practices probably make the difference between a smooth ride and one that eats itself alive. If a bolt or two are a little looser than they should be, or the wheels are a little more scratched up, the ride will be worse.

*** This post was edited by I-Nar on 7/13/2002. ***

+0

Nasty_Nate24

Saturday, July 13, 2002 3:34 PM

B&M is a company not a plural noun. Please say B&M is not B&M are. It just annoys me that you people don't have enough intelligence to find the difference between a plural noun and a singular noun.

For example: Bolliger and Mallibard are tired. (the people)

Bolliger and Mallibard is a top coaster company. (the company)

+0

DLDude13

Saturday, July 13, 2002 4:16 PM
I think Intamin has beat B&M for #1
+0

MikeMir87

Saturday, July 13, 2002 4:20 PM
I agree that some B&M's arent intense like...persay Canobie Corkscrew... Ü

-----------------
Im the #1 Canobie Lake Park Fan!!!These are my top 3 coasters:
1. S:RoS @ SFNE 2. Yankee Cannonball 3. Cyclone

+0

sfmm15

Saturday, July 13, 2002 8:06 PM

TiggerMan said:
Nitro? Rough?? OMFG

Nitro has gotta be one of the smoothest and most intense coasters I've ever been on.



have you been on goliath or mf . if you have you probobly would not call nitro smoth or intense infact it is the roughest B&M I have been on and its only a year and a half old . it is also the least intense hyper i have been on. not a bad ride just not the best hyper.

*** This post was edited by sfmm15 on 7/13/2002. ***

+0

MambaTim

Saturday, July 13, 2002 9:08 PM

Nasty_Nate24 said:

B&M is a company not a plural noun. Please say B&M is not B&M are. It just annoys me that you people don't have enough intelligence to find the difference between a plural noun and a singular noun.

For example: Bolliger and Mallibard are tired. (the people)

Bolliger and Mallibard is a top coaster company. (the company)



Sounds Like an english major got up on the wrong side of the bed today.

-----------------
Mamba;The inspiration for SD2K. It doesnt get much better than that. Come to the Midwest;and ride the most underrated coaster in the U.S.

+0

Enigma13

Sunday, July 14, 2002 1:34 AM
I personally like B&M's. My 2 favorite coasters are B&M's, AC and S:KC. I don't know about Nitro, but in my opinion AC kicks Titan's butt, and Titan is an almost clone of Goliath, which was cited as being more thrilling. Also about roughness, a lot has to do with the park. Last year when my home park was BGW, both of their B&M's were smooth as glass, while I do sense a little roughness in the corkscrews on S:KC. However, compared to other coaster I haven't felt a rough B&M. I don't think they are losing anything, they attempt to cater to a large base of riders, not too extreme not too weak. While I did not find S:UF all that thrilling, it was plenty exciting for my wife. To each their own.
+0

OutKast

Sunday, July 14, 2002 1:40 AM
Got spoiled brats?

-----------------
"Escuse me, can you tell me where the heck the Mystery Lodge is"?

+0

Nasty_Nate24

Sunday, July 14, 2002 1:44 AM

Hey I had a rough day...Sorry....Anyways

_______________________________________

MikeMir87 said:
I agree that some B&M's arent intense like...persay Canobie Corkscrew... Ü ___________________

Isn't Canobie Corkscrew an arrow coaster? Can anyone help?

*** This post was edited by Nasty_Nate24 on 7/14/2002. ***

+0

Teenage Ninja

Sunday, July 14, 2002 1:55 AM
Don't blame ya Nate had the same kinda day man. Also, I do believe that B&M's coasters might just be having a little growing pains I mean c'mon every coaster has a couple problems every now and then its a couple bumps thats about it.

-----------------
Can we change the name of Top Gun to your mom so no one wants to ride your mom?

+0

PkI FaNaTiC

Sunday, July 14, 2002 9:39 AM
Hey people people calm down. Some of you seem like you get in a fist fight over this. B&M is B&M. They have their own type of design, style, and intensity that sets them apart from all other companies. I wasn't a big B&M fan until I rode Wildfire last week. Even from morning to evening I could feel changes in roughness/smoothness. One thing that makes B&M unique IMO is how their rides perfrom from minute to minute not day to day like most companies rides. B&M found a way or by accident to make each ride on a coaster to be exciting and thrilling because you don't know what the ride will turn out to be. Every company has flaws and bad periods but B&M is certainly not in one right now.

-----------------
Kara owes me two cookies. hmmmmm cookies.

+0

rcthemepark36

Sunday, July 14, 2002 9:00 PM

2Hostyl said:

rcthemepark36 said:
"I'll take Lightning Racer over any CCI."

Just so everyone is clear, I wont go *THAT* far. The Legend is still the top woodie in my book, but Lighting Racer *is* second

And if you all think NITRO, Raging Bull, Kraken, Medusa are getting bumpy, wait till you get a ride on S:ROS@SFA or Poltergeist, or GASM-II. You'll be BEGGING for that B&M smoothness (if you're into that sort of thing).
lata,
jeremy
--who believes that all things being equal, only Hypersonic has the potential of beeing as smooth as NITRO et al.



Yeah, I just got back from Holiday World, and Legend certainly comes in a very close second to Lightning Racer.

-----------------
06/11/02
Photos from Six Flags Worlds Of Adventure were added plus some other small updates:
http://www.angelfire.com/extreme2/rollercoaster2/index.html

+0

S00perGIR

Sunday, July 14, 2002 9:13 PM
(cracks up laughing) B&M, rough?! Yah, right. Sure. Ever ridden a wooden? An pre-1992 Arrow Megalooper? That's what I thought.

-----------------
Why do they report power outages on TV? SANDWICH! Feel free to call me Mack. Or S00perd00perhyper.

+0

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums - ©2025, POP World Media, LLC
Loading...