Please visit the smaller parks

I don't think the statement that all of the "GP" enjoy bigger rides exclusively, or that it is our duty as fans to protect the smaller parks. I don't think it's right to catagoricly say that an entire group of people likes one thing or another.

If I enjoy larger parks more, it isn't my duty to fight tooth and nail for smaller parks. I think to say that we should do so to protect your beliefs is selfish.

*shrug*

-----------------

---

2Hostyl said:
Show me ONE enthusiast who has ridden that ride over the past few years that didnt wonder if the thing was going to topple over. Every report I've read has mentioned that it looked bad.

---

Naw, it's just big and blue. I have faith in the Conneaut mechanics (but I have my own dreams of climbing up there and ripping out the trim).

Hey CoasterBill42, you joined 6 days ago and are already showing your immature age? Go back to thrillnetwork's boards.

-----------------

What are you talking about, I haven't even posted

---

bigkirby said:

We saw three parks fail to open this year (Americana, Whalom, Raceworld).

I thought Americana DID open this year?!?! Only, they returned the name to LeSourdsville Lake. Is it still not open?

---

*** This post was edited by RAD on 6/18/2002. ***

The smaller parks probably don't have lines because the coasters there stink. They are probably gonna collapse soon. So go to the big parks

-----------------
Millinium Force rocks

I'm sick of the bias with small/big parks. I'm talking about parks getting respect just because they are privately owned. I hate when enthusiasts picture Paramount and Six Flags as " Evil Coporate Parks". Yeah, I like privately owned parks too, but some people are really annoying about them. It's like they try to seem different by liking private own parks better than big parks ( Don't get me wrong if you like Private Own Parks better that's your opinion, I just think there is bias)