Considering that, I think it makes sense why they would choose a floorless. The way I see it, they can't go wrong either way. I guess I'd pick an invert, but since SFStl has one, a floorless coaster might be more attractive to market.
On the other hand, Heath does mention that my two favorite floorlesses are a *mere* 700 miles from KC. Maybe I should move? ;)
CoasterFanMatt said:
^Lol, be careful, you're going to make us look nerdy. :)
Trust me dude, it's much too late for that.;)
I think that a floorless design would be good for the park. As long as they could go tall with it. To me, the best floorless models are the ones that are at least 140+ feet tall.
i'm not sure what to put here..
In other news, I wasted about 30 minutes of my life finding the house I lived in (as well as the houses of my friends) during grade school on that overhead map of Kansas City. I'm amazing myself with how much I remember. AMAZING!
You must be logged in to post