CPgenius said:
"Some of you guys think it's a crime to memorize stats of a coaster...why? ...
It's no different than a sports fan memorizing a player's free throw percentage,yards per game,RBI's,field goal percentage,etc..."
Amen brother! Through Coasterbuzz, I must say that I have learned a bunch of coaster stats in the past year, and I don't think this is a bad thing. It is a hobby of mine and people are SUPPOSED to really be into their hobbies. Now when I'm with my non-enthusiast friends at an amusement park (which is always because I never go to parks alone and have no enthusiast friends), I don't spout stats left and right, but usually my friends are interested and ask me stuff. Yes they are interested in the stuff the average person doesn't know, and no, they are not enthusiasts. My knowledge of coasters doesn't annoy them; if anything, they are annoyed by the way I want rerides when theyre ready to go home (I guess THAT'S the most annoying quality of an enthusiast :)). I do agree with other posts that I enjoy going to parks with non-enthusiasts, though, for we talk about a lot of stuff besides coasters (females, sports, etc.)
As for the woman at IOA, like others have already said, the people she was talking to must have been interested if they let the conversation continue, and I don't think she should be criticized as a "coaster snob." If anything, perhaps a true "coaster snob" is a person who assumes the average Joe isn't interested in things like the difference between a B&M and an Arrow...people are generally inquisitive about anything! To assume that someone who is not an enthusiast would not be interested in listening to someone who knows a lot talk about coasters is already stereotyping "the GP" and "the enthusiasts". All of my non-enthusiast friends find roller coasters interesting, and yes, they are happy that they can distinguish a B&M from an Intamin.
-------------
Gets off soapbox...