So I guess the whole B&M "forceless" thing was just as we thought.
Does it also bother you that riders don't actually ride inverted coasters in an inverted position or that stand-up coasters actually have seats or that wooden coasters actually have steel pieces (especially those with steel supports)? Maybe I just have other things to worry about than terminology.
-Nate
None of those things bother me as much as people that have to disect everything I say because they have some kind of problem with me. You do have more things to worry about terminology... such as the things that I say, apparently.
Acoustic Viscosity said:
Space Mountain at DL is a great example of low speed, yet high force.
Thanks sexay! ;)
The ultimate extreme example IMO is something like LoCoSuMo...slow speeds can provide some VERY strong forces...track banking and turning radius are important things to consider...Anton did! ;)
Of course, I think "family hypercoaster" is an EXCEPTIONALLY accurate term for something over 200' tall that has ONLY floats. Leaving my seat slightly to hover above it for a second or two is WAYYYY different from being tossed into the lapbar like a rag doll.
Hail Goliath,. the coaster that saved B&M from another 4-5 years of me *roasting* them... :)
*** Edited 5/16/2006 4:46:52 PM UTC by rollergator***
The Georgia Scorcher is still one of the rides i've been on that packs an enormous amount of Positive forces
You must be logged in to post
