He claims two Morgan engineers had to leave a meeting because they lived in upstate New York, yet Morgan's offices are located in California.
He also claims that a deal signed with Coca-Cola solved all the issues with the coaster's construction (violations regarding not getting permits, etc). Can someone please explain to me how a marketing deal can solve something like that?
-Nate
Like *I* was the only one thinking it? ;)
*** Edited 5/18/2004 8:23:50 PM UTC by Rob Ascough***
-Nate
-Nate (who really means Coca-Cola, though the other iinterpretation may work better)
It was the same with the Intamin Impulse in SFMW ("Hey, this is just California") which in fact had to be reconstructed because it was too high.
During the same time SF had lots of problems with "Hey, its just Germany". After local politics heavily sponsored the Warner Park with tax money, things began to turn around when SF came in. The promised new freeway-exit and modernized train station weren´t build and environmentalists strongly advocated new thrillrides. I remember that SF was not very happy and I guess that they were just happy to dump the euro-chain.
Rob Ascough said:
Just because a company is based in a certain state doesn't mean that the people running the company live there.
No, not necessarily, but (from the Chance-Morgan website):
"Our California office, located in La Selva Beach, is home to our veteran design and engineering team. This team consists of talented former D. H. Morgan Manufacturing, Inc. employees who have the distinction of developing the biggest and fastest roller coasters in the world. In addition, the California office also provides parts and technical service for all former D. H. Morgan products."
The rest of the Chance-Morgan team (marketing, sales, etc) works out of Wichita, Kansas.
I'm not arguing that the ride wasn't delayed because of permit problems; I think that much is obvious. I'm just pointing out some potential problems with that story (which he admits spawned from a lot of rumors).
-Nate
coasterdude318 said:
How do you have any idea what this ride is going to be like?-Nate
As much as I tried to stay away, I have to say it:
Nate, according to you, he's just stating an opinion, err, fact...
Nope, not trying to be funny, just stating the truth(which, in your case, is much stranger than opinion...)
The ride I was talking about had a fully visible layout online (and I never claimed anything regarding ride experience...that is, whether it will be good, bad, rough, smooth, etc). But hey, if you're still stuck on a discussion we had months ago, that's your issue.
-Nate *** Edited 5/19/2004 3:42:07 AM UTC by coasterdude318***
You act as if its okay for you to do that, but no one else can. Its not just one discussion, but most of the discussions you have on here....thats all I was pointing out....And with that, I am walking away, so say what you will.
I don't expect you to a see a difference; you're attempting to draw a connection between two completely unrelated things. You don't get it, and that's fine...it's certainly not the first time.
-Nate
You must be logged in to post