It's not even a rumor.
Besides, didn't they invest in that new Warner Bros. park in Spain a few years ago? That sounds like the building of a new theme park to me.
Yes its possible, but it will be a while, until everything is straightened out.
You should have heard the investors' questions on the last conference call. "When are you selling another park? So what would make you consider selling another park? Okay, so let's say your strategies and plans don't work again. What parks would you sell first?"
- 'Playa
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
*** Edited 8/17/2004 1:53:48 PM UTC by Rob Ascough***
Thanks,
DMC
TalonJosh1491 said:
Actually, Six Flags St. Louis was the last park the company built. I believe that was in 1971...
Actually, they built Six Flags Autoworld http://toysaregoodfood.com/content/archives/000008.html and Six Flags Power Plant http://www.taylorjeffs.com/SFPowerPlant.htm long after that...both of which were flops.
They manage WDMW Madrid, but they did not build it (they only own a small stake in it.)
The Connecticut park was proposed when TW owned SF. After Premier bought them out, they decided to "flag" Riverside as SFNE instead. *** Edited 8/17/2004 4:32:10 PM UTC by GAcoaster***
Rob Ascough said:
Why does everyone insist that Six Flags doesn't build new parks?
I don't *insist* that SF NOT build new parks...they do that themselves, LOL.
Seriously, I'd LOVE for SF to start building new parks...start in FL! :)
But, how does one *predict* the future...you start by looking at what has happened in the past, and look for TRENDS...I'd suggest there's STRONG trend that makes it *unlikely* for SF to build parks from scratch in the near future...NOT impossible, just unlikely.
You still have Zoidberg.... You ALL have Zoidberg! (V) (;,,;) (V)
I chalk this up to wishful thinking. The biggest problem is the weather. Summer (when all the kiddies are out of school) is no time to even want to go to an amusement park in AZ. When it's over 105, you really feel like doing nothing unless it's indoors. Heck when I was there last weekend, I didn't even want to get in the car. I still think movies and malls will rule summer time activity here until they figure out a way to air condition the state ;)
If it was near the mountains, it could possibly work, but I still see nothing coming of it. Everyone in AZ seems to make a yearly journey to Disney, Knott's, or SFMM (where temps are bearable). Even though Phoenix is one of the 10 largest metro areas, and Tucson has another million or so people to add to that number, I don't see it happening anytime soon.
Kyle
-Raptor Crew-
2000-01
I can think of quite a few large markets in the country that lack a major amusement park: Phoenix, Las Vegas, Miami, Jacksonville, Boston, New York City, southern FL (Cape Coral). It will only be a matter of time before someone looks at one of those areas and sees $$$. After all, someone felt there was a need for an amusement park in the middle of backwoods Alabama! Perhaps someone should have looked at that one a little more carefully...
Rob Ascough said:
I can think of quite a few large markets in the country that lack a major amusement park: Phoenix, Las Vegas, Miami, Jacksonville, Boston, New York City, southern FL (Cape Coral). ..
I highly doubt Six Flags would put a park in New York City seeing as SFGadv. is a major draw from New York City, and I think the same would apply to Boston with SFNE (although I didn't hear any Boston accents, so maybe it's too far southwest for them). Will someone else build in these places? Maybe, but I doubt Six Flags ever would.
I'll post the article from the paper this weekend about the possibility of a park in Nashville...a good market, but still wouldn't be able to pull it off.
VisionLand was one mayor's dream and was going to be built no matter what. The market couldn't (and can't) support a $90 million park.
You must be logged in to post