New Screenshots 4/17/04

I'm not sure if i'm gonna like it that much....NoLimits is fine with me.

To me, everything is looking good so far, can't wait to Buy this game. Banked drops on all coasters it seems. More rides, PPE rides. Now if the TA2K does more than just launch, hill, turn brake, I'll be very happy.

My only 2 real wishes are that the TA2K and Intamin Inverted are better than RCT2's with more options:)

I just hope all of the coasterbuiling has more options so you might be able to realisticly build a working TTD and other difficult new coasters...The requirments look reasonable...as i like to be above requirements. :)

The most appealing aspect for me will be the ability to see your coasters from the ground level, from the peeps POV. It would be very neat to "'round the corner" and see a huge coaster I've just created filling my field of vision.

WOOOOOHHHHH Peeps, some of you don't have such good common sence.

Economicly, a company wants to reach a certain amount of people so that they can reach the "break even" point and mabey even break that limit and actually make a "profit."

So, it would NOT be in Frontier or Atari's best intrest to put the system requirments too high. With what they say right now (733MHz P3 min. req.), I say that will reach a HUGE percentage of the population in today's market. I do realize that there are those with REALLY outdated machines that cannot afford to buy the newer ones... but most people actually try to keep their technology updated by at a min. of 3 years. I know I bought a new computer (P4 was just about to come out when I baught mine - a celeron *shutters*) back in 2000. Now I just updated mine to stay current and be able to play the latest games. I'd say somewhere AROUND 70 or 80 percent of computer owners that play the newest games keep their computers up-to-date by at least 2 or 3 years like I stated before.

I cannot wait to see this new game. The graphics look GREAT!

Those of you who say it "looks like STP" should really take a side-by-side look at a screen from one, and a screen from the other. The two games look NOTHING alike!

Also, the two games are marketed towards different markets, so there should NOT be ANY comparison between the two!

Come on people, use your common sence!

I have no common sence! I am dum!

well SixFlags P'86, don't forget it depends on what type of gamer you are, if you are a game lover, those people upgrade their computers more than than the general population who maybe love 5 -6 games and follow up on the new versions. And as you stated I would agree that the majority does upgrade 2-3 years, as we did we did last year when we upgraded from a 700Mhz Celeron to a 3.2 Ghz P4. The serious gamers upgrade A.S.A.P.! :) sort of like me!

---

RCTandy said:
Think about the candy/wonderland scenery in RCT2. No one uses that crap.

---

i use that scenery all the time- the parks i grew up with had huge Fairy Tale/Christmas themes- I enjoy using the various themes around my park and giving the coasters names to fit various themes (instead of my last blockbuster hit- exactly why are Top Gun and Tomb Raider in International Faire at PCW anyway- either make it a movie themed park or fit the coasters to the orginal themes- anyway back to my point)
Those who have said that the 4-D coasters are facing the "wrong" way...why not- why should we be LIMITED only to building copies of ride types that already exist- I for one would like to build a looping Water Coaster- think of it "into a huge loop then into a huge splash on your way out of the loop-"
The images load too slow for the computer i'm using- I'm out of town for two months so...i'm just going to ask it...anyone see any signs of a Roller-soaker in any of the pics- or any new 'flat rides' like the ones popping up at PCW?!

I just can't get into the new looks of it. I think I'm be staying with RCT2.

Yea...I think RCT3 will be a fun game to play(Which I'll of course be buying), but I'll stay with RCT2 when I'm trying to build realistic parks or park recreations.