Is Raging Bull Dying?

The midcourse on Raptor has not grabbed at all this year. The difference in ride quality is amazing. The last half of that ride is now more intense then the last half of Batman.

Now tell me again why that woudln't be considered a trim?

------------------
If given the choice I'd choose a hamburger over a hotdog anyday of the week.

Rollercoasters never lived in the first place!

------------------
Tales for the L33t

I've noticed for me it doesn't feel the same anymore. after 240x on it though. The first drop in the back still gets me but that really it now. My freind has been on it 400x in 4 years, he says the same.
My brother and I think (and are pretty sure of the fact) that the Bull is the most perfectly designed coaster out there. This does NOT make RB the best ride out there, however.

I think RB is because B&M and SFGAm decided to make a GOOD ride, going for quality and not quantity (like Intamin does all too often: MF, TTD, not that there's anything wrong with that).

The trims on the third hill do not take away from the ride. Just ignore them and feel the air. From anywhere on the train. The first two rows get monster ejector air and the other rows float for hours.

Think about this next time you ride - Do you feel laterals? Is the Bull not the most smooth ride out there? What other rides have better transitions? I can think of two other rides that are this smooth and as good at transitions: Medusa and Riddler's Revenge.

Remember, quality is what counts.

------------------
10 Steel: Superman ROS (SFNE), Batman TR (SFGAm), MForce, RBull, Riddler's R (SFMM), Superman UF (SFGAm), X-Flight, Goliath, TTDragster, Batman TDK (SFNE)
5 Wood: GRider, Viper (SFGAm), Legend, Raven, Beast

If a ride has a trim then does that mean it's a bad ride? I guess so...... ;)

------------------
Don't Fight It, Ride It, RAGING BULL!!!!!!- Six Flags Great America

Some of us like laterals and getting thrown out of are seats, if I wanna float i'll go swimming.

------------------
If given the choice I'd choose a hamburger over a hotdog anyday of the week.

LoL MagnumForce, good one...

------------------
Don't Fight It, Ride It, RAGING BULL!!!!!!- Six Flags Great America

A couple of comments above stood out:

1. Whizzer being more fun than Raging Bull? I love Whizzer. I grew up on Willard's Whizzer in California. Its fun. But Raging Bull is much more thrilling, "better" ride, IMO.

2. Raptor being more intense in the second half than Batman? Unless they have installed LIM or some other acceleration device, that can't be. The spacing of the elements in Raptor much more leisurely than Batman. That said, I think Raptor is a better ride, but for wall-to-wall action and hit the brakes runs flat-out G-forced out, Batman still wins.

3. Intamin v. B&M hypers: Tough one -- Superman at SFNE is awesome - the best in my view. But MForce is terrible (compared to what it could have been). I will take Raging Bull over MF *anyday* -- aside for the 1st drop, there is no air to be found on MF.

I would love to ride Raging Bull without the 3rd hill trim -- it's totally unnecessary, and takes just enough speed off to make the ride feel sluggish (I think, having never ridden it without the trims.) Still, a solid back seat ride and an interesting design (that just needs more speed to be great.)

Oh, and I think Raging Bull has probably the best back seat first drop I have even been on* (along with AC) because (1) the flat section before the first drop allows enough speed to really whip the back seat onto the drop; (2) the lack of seat belt and the exposed seat give a great impression that you are going to fly out of the train.

* Honorary mentions to SFNE Superman (love the mist tunnel) and Millennium Force.


MagnumForce said:
The midcourse on Raptor has not grabbed at all this year. The difference in ride quality is amazing. The last half of that ride is now more intense then the last half of Batman.

I agree. Raptor has been giving some kick butt rides this year thanks to the mid-course being turned off. This bird of prey has finally learned how to "fly".

X Factor


coasterdude318 said:


The bottom line is that, though Raging Bull will never compare to any Intamin coaster, it *could* (and is) a much better ride without the trims. That is, the layout certainly isn't designed to deliver like S:ROS, but the trims do significantly hurt the ride.


I love how (Edit) certain people on this site like to state their opinion as total fact. That, nate, is not the bottom line, as far as I'm concerned. I liked RB better than S: RoS. Much better. Actually, RB is my number one coaster so far, with S: RoS at #3.

A rollercoaster is only as good as you like it. That means that it's up to you whether its a good coaster or not. I like Arrows. I like really rough wood(HC5 @ the Pavalion in MB), I like B&M better(only slightly) than Intamin(though Volcano, another widely unliked coaster, is my #2 coaster).

This, to me, is the true meaning of enthusiass. When you know too much about something, it takes the fun out of it, thats why I don't try and learn all the technical aspects on a coaster. Very few of us are experts, we all do this as a hobby, not a job. Like what you like, be happy with what you have, and don't act like someone else is beneath you just because they have a differing opinion. The opinion that is most important to me is mine. I take others for face value, and make my own decisions.

------------------
Since I'm no longer considered "funny" I will not be including a signature with my comments.
*** This post was edited by TeknoScorpion 8/7/2003 10:30:46 PM ***

MagnumForce said:
Imagine if you would Raging Bull as built by Intamin

Now, Imagine if you would, Millennium Force as built by B&M...

First, get rid of those crappy seat belts. Add two more seats per row, plus the most comfortable seats and restraints on any hyper around. Next, add a lift hill with a slow, exciting climb that adds to the excitement and anticipation for the ride that silent, fast, hills lack. Then add a Raging Bull drop to it, which actually includes airtime. Note: Raging Bull's drop feels higher to me then M.F.'s drop. I hate creeping down the first 1/4 of the hill...Zzzzzzz. Anyways, back to topic. Next, let's put more in the ride than just pure speed. I do like the power of M.F., but it just lacks the air that Bull has. I can think of two, maybe three, parts in MF that have air. I can think of six parts of Raging Bull with good air, including the drop. Corkscrew at CP has more air on its drop than MF. Now since the ride is not Intamin, it will run more than 50% of the time, plus it will not just be about speed, but about a great overall layout, designed for a park without a d*mn island. LOL

Oh, and about the clapping. People clap on MF because they probably waited 3 hours to ride it. Bull doesn't get claps because people only wait 15-30 minutes, so instead of clapping and feeling complete, they go get in line and ride it again. Not many people clap on rides they've ridden over and over again. I bet most of you who frequent CP don't clap at the end anymore. SFGam doesn't attract people from all over the world, so we don't have people who feel the need to clap like CP does.

This topic is dumb, Raging Bull is not dying...Space Shuttle America...NOW THAT IS DYING!
------------------
TTD...3 Times...08/06/03...NEAT RIDE

Just so you know Millenium Force is not even in my Top 40.

BTW I believe Werner Stengal designed both Millie and Bull. You have obviously never ridden a REAL Intamin.
------------------
If given the choice I'd choose a hamburger over a hotdog anyday of the week.


MagnumForce said:


BTW I believe Werner Stengal designed both Millie and Bull. You have obviously never ridden a REAL Intamin.


OK, so what do you consider to be a REAL Intamin then?

------------------
2nd Bunny Hill, Superman: RoS SFA = AIRTIME!
BackSeat of COURSE!

Tekno, if you have some sort of personal problem with me, you might as well just come out and say it instead of prancing around the issue. I think it's generally understood that if I were to say "The Lost Coaster is a piece of crap" that it's my opinion, or if I were to say "Disaster Transport is more exciting than Magnum" that, too, is my opinion (and not being presented as an absolute fact). Therefore, when I make such statements such as "Raging Bull will never compare to any Intamin coaster", it's obviously being said as my opinion. If I need to clarify that for you, maybe you should spend more time reading through message boards and understanding how they generally operate. Additionally, I have never felt that the fun of this hobby has been taken away or has decreased at all. On the contrary, the more I have learned, the more appreciation I have gained for what really are good rides (clarification for those who can't comprehend basic communications: IMO) and the more fun I have had with this hobby. My definition of enthusiass are those who try to tell others how they should and shouldn't enjoy the hobby.

BackSeat Buller, your arguments don't hold. Millennium Force is an extremely reliable ride, and has been since day one (ie it's running far more than 50% of the time). This goes for the other Intamin hypercoasters as well. Additionally, people clap on Millennium Force and S:ROS no matter how long the line is. If anything, a shorter line makes me enjoy the ride more because I'm not already pissed off when I finally get to ride (and thus, more likely to clap).

-Nate

Is this the only time we have ever agreed on a topic Nate?

------------------
If given the choice I'd choose a hamburger over a hotdog anyday of the week.

Stating that something is the "bottom line" is essentially saying that that is what is correct, and that anything else isn't correct. I'm glad you have your opinions. I don't know you at all, so I can't say I don't like you or I do. In real life, you may be a nice guy, but on here, mostly all I see you do is act negative towards people. This is the first time I've actually saw you say you enjoy something.

If something is my opinion, I state it as such. I don't say "All coasters by designer/company/at park X suck, thats the bottom line". I applaud you on having your own opinion, but stating it as fact, which is what you did, makes it seem as if you are saying that only your opinions count. Disagreeing with someone is fine, heck I think Arrows are good coasters, and most will say that i'm full of *hit, but thats an opinion. I do agree with some things you say, even on this thread.

Basically, stating your opinion is fine, but do that. Don't write it in a way that makes it look like you're an expert in a field that is, in reality, just your hobby. That makes you look like an enthusiass(I do agree with your definition on that, but saying that something is the bottom line is like telling someone that is how they are to enjoy something).

When you say that something is crap, or something is the best, thats fine, but there is no need to add a "Bottom Line", cause that just makes it sound like you're stating it as fact. I see you say things like that alot.

Again, I have nothing personal against you, I don't know you, but saying that something is this or that way, when that is only your opinion is just a bit on the egotist's side, if you ask me.

------------------
Since I'm no longer considered "funny" I will not be including a signature with my comments.

I think you're confused about what "bottom line" means (or at least how it was used in my above post). In the instance I used it, it meant the same thing as saying "in closing", "the point of my post is", "to summarize", or any other such wordings that make it clear that this is the point I'm trying to make, and this is the basic idea of my post. It doesn't mean "the fact is" or "the following is absolutely, undeniably true:". Again, Basic Understanding of Communications on Message Boards 101.

I have never stated an opinion and claimed it as fact. You don't need to add "in my opinion" to every opinion you state because it's redundant and ridiculous. Generally knowledgable people are able to ascertain that it's an opinion simply because it cannot be proven.

Bottom line is (again, substitute "to summarize" if you wish), saying "Bottom line is" does not claim that the following words be taken as absolute fact. An opinion can just as easily follow and still be acceptable. I suggest actually thinking about what people are saying before jumping to conclusions. The only thing I find egotistic in this thread is the fact that you apparently felt the need to correct a problem that didn't even exist, since clearly (as evidenced by no posts challenging it) the rest of the CB world realized it was my opinion, and just an opinion.

MagnumForce: This may be the first time we've agreed, I dunno, but I did throw in some Magnum slams for good measure.

-Nate

"And that's the bottom line, because Stone Cold said so..."

Whoa...I am channelling WWE superstars... ;)

------------------
--George H
Currency Tracking Experiment...Where's George.com

My New Blog...Check it out

Well I came very late to the topic (that's what 12 day vacations do to you!) but feel as though I should add some thoughts.

I just rode Raging Bull three times on Sat and Sunday of this past weekend and it hasn't lost a step. Sure it wasn't running the BEST it's ever run, but it definitely wasn't running poorly.

The trim on the third hill was activating and the blocks were activating. Sometimes the blocks were hitting a little hard, but by the end of the coaster, the train was still traveling as fast as it normally does. We rode in row 9 all three times and there are six to seven spots of air depending if you're on the left side of the train or not.

Raging Bull is still alive and kicking ass!

------------------
Top Thrill Dragster -- The most intense, unbelievable, and spectacular fifteen seconds on any coaster, anywhere, ever.

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums - ©2024, POP World Media, LLC
Loading...