Yes, the waterparks are separate at Cedar Point, Knott's, and Worlds of Fun. They are included at Geauga Lake, Michigan's Adventure, and Dorney Park.
Looks to me like there is no concensus to the way Cedar Fair handles its waterparks. :)
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
lakecrystal said:
I bet they install a new Monorail that gets you from A to B. Not sure the exact mapping they would use for it, but it could work.
I have a hard time believing they'd add a new monorail. A shuttle monorail from the far corner of the park (HH) to the other corner (new waterpark) over a bit of the lake to get around the housing development would kinda make sense, but I can't imagine the cost of a full circuit monorail that would go around the whole park (or lake) and would do little to draw additional crowds. It just doesn't make sense.
- DJ
"When the end of the world comes, I want to be in Cincinnati because it's always twenty years behind the times." - Mark Twain
Also:
EagleFan344, what is wrong with Dominator and X-Flight? They are perfect rides... *** Edited 7/2/2005 6:30:29 AM UTC by Keith2005***
lakecrystal said:
please tell me where I said anything about a full circuit Monorail. I said from A to B. which would be some type of ride to either take you from the north side to happy harbor and back, or across the lake where the boardwalk use to be.
When was the last time a large transportation-based ride was built long after the park had been opened? A few decades ago that was common when chairlifts, trains, and occasionally monorails were constructed, but is that done often anymore? I can't think of any examples, and I can't search rcdb for rides like this. What are the odds that GL breaks that trend?
- DJ
"When the end of the world comes, I want to be in Cincinnati because it's always twenty years behind the times." - Mark Twain
I wouldn't be against a chair lift along and possibly over the water at parts (sort of where they used to have it back in the day), if I may add.
Floorless Fan said: But if I remember right, when SF owned GL the city of Aurora rode them constantly about their aspirations to put in a hyper because of noise, and because a large hyper could be an eyesore,
Sorry to bring this topic back up but SF did have an agreement with Bainbridge Township, back in 2002 I believe, to raise the height limit to 210 feet in order to put in the proposed hyper. Of course this meant creating "no ride zones" whereas the park could not build rides in certain areas close to residential property. I would think this agreement is still in place now that CF has the property.
Yes, Aurora made a stink about it but SF did get the okay to do it. There were even rumors that possibly the height limit was raised a few feet higher. An S&S tower complex like Dorney's Dominator or Intamin Giant Drop like Kennywood's Pittfall could be put in but would have to be properly placed as to not infringe on the agreement with Bainbridge.
X Factor
Cedar Fair would not get rid of Mr. Hides Nasty Fall because rumor has it that Cedar Fair made it safer. My friend was at Geauga Lake recently and said the ride was good. If any thing I would say that the Monerail and/or the Skyscraper would go. Most deffenetly it would be the Monerail because it is kind of lame. *** Edited 7/6/2005 2:16:13 AM UTC by mean streak 2007*** *** Edited 7/6/2005 2:18:58 AM UTC by mean streak 2007***
You must be logged in to post