------------------
Mike
Favorite Wood: Viper at SFGAM,Shivering Timbers
Favorite Steel: Magnum and Raging Bull
------------------
--George H
---Superman the ride...coming to a SF park near you soon...
Currency tracking experiment... http://www.wheresgeorge.com (Referring to The "George" on the $1 bill - Not Me)
Parks make choices. Said Six Flags parks obviously don't care if they're guests wait. They spend all of this money on pointless queue management schemes (in part to get more money from you) when they don't run the rides efficiently in the first place.
My favorite park never does this, and you can get in line to ride at exactly closing time. I need not even go down this road again...
------------------
Jeff - Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com - Sillynonsense.com
"The world rotates to The Ultra-Heavy Beat!" - KMFDM
------------------
http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~bnoble/
------------------
Krimson n' Kream, Spr 98
------------------
Summer 03-CP, HP, Canobie, SFNE, SFWOA, and SFGAm.
But with SFWoA, I remember even before it was re-branded, the park seemed to love to run only one train when it wasn't too busy. So I don't know if I can attribute the poor operations to Six Flags. What I will say though, is that the park was much better when it was Geaga Lake, as back then it wasn't trying to be something it was not. It was a great little local park, and it didn't matter much that coasters would run only one train, or that in general the park wasn't very good because it was OUR park. I didn't care about how crappy it was because I didn't expect better. You expected it to be worse than other, bigger parks, and it was cheaper anyway. Since Six Flags has taken over, they have tried to market it as a world class park, which it most certainly is not.
Sorry about the rant about SFWoA and CP, but since I was on a roll, I continued.
-Sam
------------------
Avalanch Run - My first Roller Coaster.
Magnum XL-200 - The BEST Roller Coaster!
My conspiracy theory on this subject is that in order to sell their upcharge Lo-Q, they want lines to be as long as possible, even when it is not crowded in order to get the public conditioned into using this awful system every time they come to the park. It's as if they don't make enough extra money with the parking, food, games, etc..
------------------
Jim Hansen
Number of coasters ridden: 232
------------------
Warning: I do not think like the average person. My remarks have plenty of thought behind them. Take it for what it's worth, if you disagree, please, feel free to express it, but don't put me down because of it.
I did mention to the Q-Bot person that had I paid for the thing, then saw that the perk was not operating on some of the rides, I'd have been mad. Since it was free, and the only line we waited in all day was for the back seat of the Cyclone, we really didn't care too much. But in this case,. they didn't run 1 train in the afternoon to get people to use Qbot.
My question is how much of a difference does it make on a truly slow day? The one train ops I saw on sunday meant that I had to wait 10 minutes rather than have walk ons at every ride. Big deal. Griping about waiting in small lines at a park is like griping about the heat in the summer.
------------------
I sing sometimes for the war that I fight, 'cause every tool is a weapon, if you hold it right. -Ani Difranco
The fact is, running coasters below capacity is an annoyance found at all manner of parks but as always with park complaints people choose to highlight SF!
There is that crowd level that is not enough to run more than one coaster train, but too many to maintain a short line. I understand if the park doesnt want to run half empty trains, but it shouldn't reach the point of a rediculously long wait.
Parks should show appreatiation for people visiting on slow days by keeping the lines shorter than usuial if possible. This would help overcrowding on busier days.
Management should give this problem a higher priority, that's what I think.
------------------
Think for yourself-Don't reley on someone else.
Jeff said:
And I will always maintain that John Q. Guest doesn't really care about who is sick or trained or whatever. That's an operational issue, nobody cares.Parks make choices. Said Six Flags parks obviously don't care if they're guests wait. They spend all of this money on pointless queue management schemes (in part to get more money from you) when they don't run the rides efficiently in the first place.
My favorite park never does this, and you can get in line to ride at exactly closing time. I need not even go down this road again...
Hey....me again....AGAIN? Like you had a choice...;)
Point 1: Righteous....exactly....*enthusiast #1* or John Q. Public, both notice wait times...and while JQP may never use the term *single-training*, you WILL hear "wow, this line moves slow"....;)
Point 2: Said it before myself, run AT capacity, THEN work on queue management *schemes*....and IF you need (or choose) to have Lo-Q/FP/FL what have ya, then add the extra staff necessary....it DOES take more people to operate multiple queues without creating chaos and hostility...
Point 3: The *chain* doesn't matter, it's the PARK....I've had some serious capacity issues at some SF parks, some CF parks, and yes, some Paramount parks, too. Can't say Universal or Busch is immune to this problem either. *Saving money* in this fashion, it WILL cost ya in the long run....hey, I'm an economist...;)
------------------
Dr. Thrill IS my family practitioner
Guaranteed humorous or your money back!
And now for a question: How much money do you actually save not sending the maximum amount of trains out? I honestly cant think of any other cost besides the extra time mechanics have to check over the train and the extra electricty used for running the lift and brakes. It cant be that much!
------------------
Summer 03-CP, HP, Canobie, SFNE, SFWOA, and SFGAm.
You must be logged in to post