Posted
The Ohio Department of Agriculture announced Friday it has completed its investigation into an incident involving Cedar Point's Top Thrill Dragster. In August, a woman was hit in the head and severely injured by a metal plate that separated from a train on the ride. The investigation showed that a screw appeared to spontaneously break, causing the separation of the plate. The Ohio Department of Agriculture found no evidence that the park violated any laws.
Read more from WSYX/Columbus.
As I've said before, I wouldn't be surprised if they were different.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
You're probably right, Jeff. I really wonder why and how they're different, though. Is TTD that different from all the others? RCDB lists 10 other "accelerator" coasters currently operating and of course all but Xcelerator opened after TTD. Were there designs or features that Intamin experimented with on TTD that they decided to ditch before, say, Storm Runner opened a year later? If so, why not retrofit TTD?
I feel like I have more questions now than I did before. Not out of skepticism or anything, just curiosity. I want to know how all these things work, dangit.
- Julie
@julie
Per previous conversations, I have a feeling that it's due to CP's initial effort and the design for trains to move synchronously between the different blocks. Once they realized that was problematic and just not really feasible, no other parks undertook the effort to try to execute that.
Edit: As far as retrofitting, why spend the money changing the hardware? It's more logical to just make minor programming changes to work with the hardware you already had in place.
You must be logged in to post