Beast Tamer said:
I don't think it will be thrilling. It is just a standard looper. It's lift is only around a 100'!
This is your expert opinion? Oh, that's right, if it isn't over 200' tall it isn't worth the wood. Oh, this one isn't even wood, crap...
--Greg
"You seem healthy. So much for voodoo."
We've said it a million times around here, there is no correlation between the size and the quality of a ride. If I immediately dismissed every ride under 100, 150 feet or so, I'd be missing many of my favorites. If I rode only rides taller than 200 feet, I'd be stuck riding SOB and Nitro.
If given an ultimatum, I'd keep riding the small ones...
...sorry, Moosh.
Yeah, I ride the BIG ones, Dominator, Magnum, MF, Phantom, Steel Venom etc. All have very LARGE traits about the ride. Such as Dominator has one of the tallest vertical loops in the world, Magnum was the first to break the 200ft mark, MF was the first 300 footer, Phantom was the first to break the 80mph mark, and Steel Venom was the first vertical spiraling Impulse coaster, at 70+ mph and over 180ft it's insaine.
However, even though I ride those, I still ride say, Double loop, or say Big Dipper? Or Space Mountain or BTMRR, and also Corkscrew and Iron Dragon. And everytime I ride those, I get great thrills. How about X-flight? it's 125 feet and one of the best thrills I've ever had.
"only a 100 feet" C'mon man thats just crazy.
We should believe him and his expert knowledge on what people like and dislike. After all, he has ridden son of beast.
According to him, if it is a smooth ride it must not be any good and not worth the time of day. So it has to be true.
what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard.
Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it.
I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
You must be logged in to post