but man, that was over three years ago. I think that idea is probably scrapped by now. I mean 500 ft? The tallest is about 300ft right now. Why spend all that extra money for something that tall, when you can get the record for cheaper?
Not to mention, what would you charge for a 500ft skycoaster to make it profitable? And would people pay it?
------------------
Top Thrill Dragster -- The most intense, unbelievable, and spectacular fifteen seconds on any coaster, anywhere, ever.
The 300ft Skycoaster of Florida costs $37 per rider to ride. There is no other skycoaster in existence that I know of that costs that much.
If they DIDN'T charge more it would take that much longer to pay off since it'd be exponentially more expensive.
That's why it'd cost more.
------------------
Top Thrill Dragster -- The most intense, unbelievable, and spectacular fifteen seconds on any coaster, anywhere, ever.
However, I think the price goes down the more people who ride right? From my experience, I *believe* the price is the same or very slightly cheaper for the FL skycoaster. I might be wrong though, it's been a while since I've been on it.
Either way, I think my point stands, a 500ft skycoaster would more than likely cost more than a 300ft one.
------------------
Top Thrill Dragster -- The most intense, unbelievable, and spectacular fifteen seconds on any coaster, anywhere, ever.
You must be logged in to post