-------------
Enjoy Your Flight on the Raaaven!
-----------------
The Beast and Night, They go together like Peanut Butter and Jelly
I hate to turn this into a SF neglect topic but the answer is that, Six Flags Neglects the parks. Why build up a park that doesn't really have decent competition. They have done it with SFEG also, and if will probably do it with Jazzland. They build it up the first few years they own the park and than leave it. It happens, will continue to happen, and it is smart of SF to do it.
They will add a new ride every 3 to5 years to keep people coming, but nothing major or ground breaking.
Well there are actually a couple of factors why we dont get anything. 1. the most obvious- there's an airport right across the street which you cant build over a certain height 2. bad managment 3. bad employees (most dont care). SFKK had great potential when SF bought them, now it is just dust in the wind
RubberDucky said:
I hate to turn this into a SF neglect topic but the answer is that, Six Flags Neglects the parks. Why build up a park that doesn't really have decent competition. They have done it with SFEG also, and if will probably do it with Jazzland. They build it up the first few years they own the park and than leave it. It happens, will continue to happen, and it is smart of SF to do it.
They will add a new ride every 3 to5 years to keep people coming, but nothing major or ground breaking.
They did not build Kentucky Kingdom. It was a Premier Inc. park that later took on the Six Flags title when Time Warner sold the entire chain.
Kentucky Kingdom was not originally Alfa or Premier. It was an independent park, went bankrupt and closed (all the rides were sold off), then some of the unpaid creditors got together and took control of the property and reopened the park. Those people were responsible for the explosive expansion the park saw through the 90's. The last project they were resonsible for was Twisted Twins (or Double Trouble, or Twisted Sisters, depending on the time you would ask for the name of the ride).
I get the impression they built the park up rapidly in an effort to make it attractive to potential buyers. They got that place up to a million annual visits pretty quick, then promptly sold it. Hopefully they got back the money the original developers owed them! (Though the deal was mostly assumed debt, and not much cash. Probably still a relief to the owners, because nobody was willing to lend any more money to KK--sounds like the park was again approaching the end of the line. Guess who paid to build Chang? Not the park, but one of the individual investors--because the park couldn't secure financing.)
(And yes, I know that Twisted Twins opened after Premier Parks took control, but that ball was already rolling from the previous owners--sorta like Top Gun at PKI, Premier inherited this project from the previous group.)
(And yes, I am in a parenthetical mood today.)
-----------------
Dave
RCDB lists Chang as being 154 ft. tall and S:UE as being 180 ft. tall. Unless they can build higher than 180 ft. It would seem like an un-likely possibility of them getting an Impulse. But then again what’s to say Itamin can’t built a smaller impulse in the 150-160 range.
-----------------
“If you give a enthusiast a footer.......He’ll want a coaster!!!"
*** This post was edited by Goku2216 on 8/13/2002. ***
Aside from T2 (Vekoma SLC), all of their coasters are good, fun rides (especially Chang and Thunder Run). The Blizzard River raft ride is top shelf (as Trekker said) and they have some decent flats also.
I would LOVE to see them get an Intamin Impulse. Wicked Twister and S:UE have hooked me for life. Of course, after PKS's latest financial report, they might be putting off some of their expansion plans. :-(
You must be logged in to post
