Joe Carroll said:
"I think the biggest reason Shockwave has no line is it's location in the park + the fact that Raging Bull is so popular. Once Raging Bull went in, the focus of the park shifted to the Southwest Territory. It's not that Shockwave is that bad, it's that Raging Bull is better, and Shockwave is sitting all by itself in the corner of the park. I rode it today and it was pretty smooth, and like mentioned above, the Gs in the rear seet through the loops was great !"
One would think that Shockwave would get more traffic - it is right in the front of the park - it is fairly close to V2 and BTR, which get heavy traffic. My last 4 visits (over a year and a half) was walk-on conditions in the queue. Regardless of opinions on the quality of the ride, however, the lack of ridership will ultimately cause SFGAm to look at better uses for the space, because low ridership=low return on investment. Plus, the ride is in a very visible location - a location that is ideal for an "attention getting" ride such as a fourth dimension. Yet, people go right by Shockwave to other rides. From a strictly economic sense, it makes sense to replace Shockwave. I am not trying to upset fans of this ride or give it a hard time, but Shockwave is not making SFGAm any money. I envision its replacement with something new, attention getting, that will draw crowds. My opinion on this matter is only reinforced by SFGAm's firm hold in the Chicago market, plus the fact that SFGAm is one of SF's best parks - a park that SF is sure to pump dollars into in the future.
-------------
First we Rock - Then we Roll!