Plus i know what some of you think. Its intamin ill pass, but admit it most of you have tried them and liked these two coasters. What stops a park from saying wow these are doing well, and recieve some great accolades, both being named coaster of the year for steel. Is money a factor? Or is the sheer size of them just to much for parks to put on a small amount of space. I always thought that someone else would be up to the task. Trust me i am not the biggest intamin fan but, enjoy a few of their coasters immenely, MF and Stormrunner, unfortunately no ride on Supes yet. Just want to hear what you guys and gals think.
Resident Arrow Dynamics Whore
2022 Trips: WDW, Sea World San Diego & Orlando, CP, KI, BGW, Bay Beach, Canobie Lake, Universal Orlando
Your mileage may vary.
Chuck, who was blown away by it his first visit but now finds it VERY BORING.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Like others have said, we haven't seen another Millie due to a combination of cost and space. When another park decides they want one, we'll see it, but that's a HUGE investment in more than one way...
--Greg
"You seem healthy. So much for voodoo."
I still don't think thats what took away from Millie though. It's just fast and thats about it.
Your right Im a woodie snob and honestly at SFNE I prefered Cyclone but it was only running one train so we only got two rides. Both backseat.
Still a shame, I'll probably never be able to ride S:ROS or Millie again,
Chuck *** Edited 9/8/2005 6:53:30 AM UTC by Charles Nungester***
Both also cost more than a few pennies too.
Resident Arrow Dynamics Whore
Colin Fisher said:
Land issues, cost, and maybe everyone is starting to get there hands on rockets? Or already has some sort of hyper. Wheather it be Givanolla or B&M or Intamin.
Also, don't forget that CP had Magnum for quite a long time. It was pretty old when they put in MF. Most parks are just recently within the past few years putting in mega coasters. So, it would be silly to invest in a giga coaster when you have a mega coaster that's only a few years old. Money would be better spent on something different. I guess the parks that don't have a mega coaster could consider a giga, but most of them probably have less money to spend on something on that magnitude.
Millenium Force is a lot of hype IMO because of it's size. They layout isn't very interesting except for the overbanked turns.
1. MF cost 25 million that is the same as KK and TTD. So yes they are expensive but not some rediculous number.
2. Other than the lift hills giga's don't have to take up that much more room than other rides. Parks can do what CP point did and make the track length smaller with a magnetic braking system. And offcourse the space that the lift hill takes up can be reduced by making a steeper lift like a cable lift like on MF. Here is a question for you other CP experts which rides lift takes up more space: Magnum or MF?
Giga coasters can be as cheep as intamin terra rockets, but are much more reliable, better, and longer rides.
-Eric: Major Parks: SFNE(homepark), SFA,SFGADV,CP,BGE,BGA,Kennywood,and Sea World: Track record 65 different coasters ridden #1 is Millennium Force #2 is El Toro and than there are all the others
A 25 millions investment for a single coaster is just way too big for most parks! For the price, most amusement park could build a whole new area with coasters, flat rides, shops and restaurants!
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
GIGAFORCE01 said:
1. MF cost 25 million that is the same as KK and TTD. So yes they are expensive but not some rediculous number.
There are still very few parks that can justify that kind of pricetag, though.
--Greg
"You seem healthy. So much for voodoo."
You must be logged in to post