In the first three years Cedar Fair has owned Geauga Lake they have been unable to break the 700,000 annual attendance mark. It really feels like Cedar Fair is giving up on the park and letting it die a slow and painful death. Two popular roller coasters were removed because Geauga Lake is doing poorly and operating those two rides puts them deeper and deeper into the red. Cost cutting like this is likely to decrease per-cap operating expenses, but it also worsens the guest experience. The reality is: poor attendance at GL begets cost cutting; cost cutting ruins the guest experience and begets more cost cutting. This vicious cycle is the reason Geauga Lake cannot and will not survive in the long term as long as Cedar Fair owns it.
The best hope for Geauga Lake is for the park to be spun off and taken private. The private owner of the park has to focus on long-term results instead of annual or quarterly results. The private owner needs to pay competitive wages (which I understand from some of the park sweepers is bare minimum wage) to get better employees, improve the park’s marketing (which is extremely poor this year), correct the removal of live shows, and generally do whatever it takes to get people in the door. If that means lowering in-park prices, getting rid of the parking fee, or adding a new ride (I don’t think Cedar Fair has added a single one), the private owner needs to accept lower per-cap numbers in the short term.
With the massive debt that Cedar Fair has taken on, shareholders will put the company under pressure to get rid of Geauga Lake for two reasons: 1) Geauga Lake has turned into a money bleeding liability for Cedar Fair and 2) selling the park will generate quick cash which can be used to pay down the debt.
I know it may be difficult to accept, but Geauga Lake cannot survive as part of a public company, and if opening day attendance is any indicator, Geauga Lake will perform poorly again this summer. The parent company obviously isn’t giving Geauga Lake the resources it needs to make the improvements that will actually bring people into the park. If Geauga Lake is taken private and given the resources it needs to succeed, it can. This park has been popular and profitable in the past and the place is definitely not hopeless. The watermark is extremely nice and there is enough land around that lake for years and years of growth. The primary problem with Geauga Lake is that Cedar Fair will not let the park succeed. For those of you looking for the “big turnaround,” you’re going to have to wait until Geauga Lake goes private.
I still stand by that statement.
Feel the same about the Great America Viper, too bad such a great woodie is in such a lame park.
I really think advertising free parking and free pop would do wonders for ANY park - any park that doesn't already have em of course.
Anyway, I also feel that Geauga Lake is doomed, so to speak. It's a shame, but It really all goes back to Six Flags trying to turn it into a Super Park, which it was clearly never meant to be.
The park could make it and make it big IMHO they just won't do whats needed like get rid of a big parking fee and high priced food.
Chuck, who likes Geauga but also feels that the waterpark isn't worth the 4hour drive. The animal side combined with the park was.
GL did just fine from 1888-1996. Its tough to change a park that old's direction in so little time.
The Funtime model was to book groups from the NE Ohio area, while getting weekend traffic from Sea World. Being that Pittsburgh made up 50% of the SWO market, GL grabbed all the overnight business.
GL is too close to the Point to 'compete', so they are trying to create a different experience. It was a similar story on how Kennywood took Idlewild in a different direction.
However, GL was a more 'popular' park, that has more assets. In the right managements hands, GL could use the weapons of rides, shows, whales, penguins, 2 parking lots, and group pavillions that can seat over 10,000 at once for catering.
SF, however, missed the target on every attempt. Would GL be batter in Kennywoods hands? Knoebels? Probably. GL needs to return to a classic park. Cleveland's Park. Group picnics. The Wave. Octoberfest. Geauga Dog. These are big wounds that waterslides and cabanas can't cure for some time.
Unlike the past three opening days, Wildwater Kingdom opened today and even though it wasn't seriously crowded like it can get there were quite a few people over there.
That first hour before the water park opened the guests were flocking to the rides. Dominator's station was quite busy with trains going pretty full. Head Spin even had a full train when I got in line for it. So there's interest in the rides but just like Holiday World and Dorney Park, the lines for rides die out when the water park opens.
Starchaser said:
^How on Earth is SFGAm lame?.
Parking is $15, a large coke is $4.06, rides are usually closed and or understaffed/not run to capacity. Basically, it's six flags. Ok, I was a bit harsh. I'm glad that my home six flags park is Great America, and not one of the other parks.
It's lame compared to the amount of fun I personally have at Indiana Beach (thank the maker that it's only 2 hrs away) or Holidayworld (or Hershey or Kennywood or Mt. Olympus, etc...)
Bolliger/Mabillard for President in '08 NOT Dinn/Summers
Fate is the path of least resistance.
coastin' since 1985
Agent Johnson said:
GL needs to return to a classic park. Cleveland's Park. Group picnics. The Wave. Octoberfest. Geauga Dog. These are big wounds that waterslides and cabanas can't cure for some time.
Couldn't say it any better myself. Are they booking picnics again?
As a Cedar Fair unitholder (not shares - its a partnership) I am actually happy with the direction of Geauga Lake. As for bleeding money - do you know that for sure? As for the debt, it will be paid off by 2012 (5 years from now) and Cedar Fair will be stronger than ever.
GL needs time to return to glory, and 2 years is not enough. GL is not the lowest attended park owned by Cedar Fair, I believe that is MiA, yet no one is calling for its demise.
". . . don't you know baby that life is a scream!" - Gordon Gano
2006 - 2009 Cedar Fair Ride Operations
2009 - Walt Disney World Attractions.
That's really interesting that you are, Coasterdad.
I am still trying to understand the complete difference between a corporation and a limited partnership! It's part of my major so I gotta learn quick.
CoasterDad, I do not know for sure how good or bad Geauga Lake's financials look since the company doesn't release specific park numbers. My logic is that given the low ratio of employees to customers in the park sometimes (such as today), each person would have to spend quite a bit of money just for Geauga Lake to break even on labor costs. I also think that Cedar Fair has said in numerous press releases that Geauga Lake has been disappointing. I don't think Cedar Fair is a good investment right now and I personally wouldn't invest my money in the company until that debt is off the books.
Free parking and free pop are examples of things Geauga Lake will never do under Cedar Fair because those two items are responsible for a big part of per-cap revenue; and yet they are two perfect ways to enhance the guest experience. I believe the food service could be greatly improved if the food service was operated like private parks like Kennywood, Knobles, and Holiday World. I feel like the big corporate parks probably have contracts with big providers which don't make especially good food and won't or can't deviate from those contracts.
Sometimes it is the small things that really make a difference. Just think about all the policies the park has now. Most of them have good intentions but a lot more unintended consequences than there should be. It isn't pleasant to be standing in a line and hear a ride employee scream repeatedly until a kid stops sitting on the bars in the station. I understand that people should sit on them, but harassing your customers to follow the rules is not good customer service. The atmosphere at Geauga Lake stinks, frankly; it just isn't really a very fun place to be.
Chuck, who likes Geauga but also feels that the waterpark isn't worth the 4hour drive. The animal side combined with the park was.
Aaah, just the point I was trying to make in the other column.... I wouldn't drive 4 hours for a water park, either.
You must be logged in to post