Cedar Fair should really look into that area
-----------------
-Nick Catalano
*** This post was edited by SFGRAMBoy20 on 10/21/2001. ***
Just my opinion,
-------------
Bob Hansen
"Excuse me while I kick the sky!"
kickthesky@hotmail.com
Interesting thoughts. But now that Mount Olympus is on it's way to becoming a full theme park, maybe another option may present itself. I just don't see the Olympus folks selling out. But a huge Cedar Fair park would do very well. That area just keeps getting bigger and bigger and will continue to expand. If there are more attractions more people will continue to come. All they have to do is attach an indoor waterpark to the hotel and they are a yearound operation. Nuff said. In my opinion this would be a slam dunk. Just how much oposition would they get from Mt. Olympus.
Interesting.
BMCOASTER
Nissan 350Z Driver
Big Chief's is taking charge of that with Mt Olympus. Would there be room to support another park? Probably considering how many waterparks that little town can support.
BMCOASTER
Nissan 350Z Driver
The Dells, or another location, to me that's the REAL question....CF *will* continue to grow and expand, but they'll stick with the "tried and true" method of buying previously-existing parks...(remember Visionland?)...;)
I know next-to-nothing about the owners of Mount Olympus as to whether they'd be interested....but I *do* love the names/theme of the park/coasters! :)
You still have Zoidberg.... You ALL have Zoidberg! (V) (;,,;) (V)
But, I cannot see such a high-class chain as Cedar Fair moving into the Dells, one of the most trashy destinations in the midwest. The Dells isin't really set up for a new, large, gated park. The Dells seems to accomodate smaller, half-day attractions a lot better than a whole new destination.
BTW, this thread is almost 3 years old, nice work. :)
Gator was talking about 'steal' as in Bargain, which is definitly what CF got when they bought Geauga. I've never been to the Dells, but isn't that kind of the whole argument? It dosen't have a full days attraction there, and maybe they should put one there.
And on the resurrecting of a 3 year old topic, there isn't anything wrong with that, per-se, if it is a relevant resurrection. But to just ressurect something by posting "Me Too", thats when people get peeved.
I'll let you guess where I'd rather go...
You must be logged in to post