Ride of Steel said:
Whats the difference between a breakdance and a remix?
A Breakdance has 3, 4, or 5 spinning turntables each with 4 free spinning cars. Portable ones are normally on a tilt to enhance the spinning, and to make it look more impressive. MOST of the non-trailor mounted versions are flat.
The Remix is a totally different ride with totally different sensations. While it may look similar, the actual cars are not free spinning, and Remix can go MUCH faster than a Breakdance. Remix also has hydrolics on each arm that tilt each hub out for a pretty strong positive g filled experience.
Also, Super7, other people besides Marineland have Huss Magics. There are 3 (at least) traveling in Europe.
Brian, who wonders if there was anyone else who felt Roundups were just Gravitron Jrs. *stifles barf*
Homey G. said:
People are talking about Disk-o's and how they potentially too extreme?Brian, who wonders if there was anyone else who felt Roundups were just Gravitron Jrs. *stifles barf*
Thing is, Would people even be talking about the Disk-O's if they weren't extreme?
Second, Holiday World has been experiencing such growth because they've been adding rides that are highly marketable--I'm sorry, but I don't see myself driving from out of town just because the park added a restored ride that goes around in a circle.
Lastly, what makes you the maintenance expert? The Turtle burns out several motors when an op needs to stop the ride on an emergency basis, Octopus and Paratrooper do not (this occurred when a patron was on the platform when the ride was in motion). The Turtle breaks down if the operator tries to park it when it is moving backwards, Octopus and Paratrooper do not (directly from two operators of the ride). Each ride presents its own challenges, but parks with Octopus and Paratrooper rides don't have the problem that the Turtle does when parts need replaced--they aren't the only one in the country! *** Edited 9/2/2004 2:16:55 AM UTC by PhantomTails***
Conneaut has many problems. I know the problems with the Bug there, and without going in to detail on someone else's problem, I honestly wouldn't expect it to run again. Ever. That's just a result of their financial situation (compounded by having to lay their maintenance staff off every winter.) At a park like HW or KW, the problem would've been nipped in the bud and never snowballed to this point.
Holiday World takes exceptional care of their rides. I'd rate their coaster maintenance second only to mine. ( :) ) They'd do a fine job keeping the ride going.
To concede, though, for as large a footprint as that ride has, it's not enough of a draw. Holiday World, at its present rate, is going to have one hell of an overcrowding/capacity issue. They need rides that churn people through. It is also true that with the exception of a few history buffs and enthusiasts, no one will care if the park adds a Turtle.
They need a ride that will both boost attendance and not hinder capacity. The Bug resolves neither of those issues.
Hi
Trekker Park said:
There are obviously ways to maintain Tumble Bug / Turtle rides because parks do it.
Parks? As in more than one? How many parks in the U.S. do you know of that maintain Tumble Bugs? I know of one.
This is America. We may have exported thousands of jobs lately and closed lots of mills, but we still have several million gifted machinists with the equipment to make things. If a park needs a piece of equipment, it can find someone to make it, and it won't bankrupt them, either. Indiana has little shops everywhere --- it's the land of the 500, remember --- and some of those machinists would do it.
Sure those machinists would do it. For a price. Machining parts like that is an expensive proposition and I don't see any park making an effort to do that for a Tumble Bug. If it made sense to machine parts to bring a Tumble Bug back into service, you can bet that Knoebels would have already done it.
Don't get me wrong- I would LOVE to see a park install and operate a Tumble Bug! I'm not down on the idea at all. But as much as I love the idea of preservation, I can't blame a park for not wanting to get involved with a Tumble Bug.
*** Edited 9/2/2004 6:17:18 AM UTC by Rob Ascough***
I guess I wasn't 100% clear in my earlier post, sorry. The ride was manufactured in 1958 and it's time to retire it. Replacement parts are not readily available; therefore the ride has been down much of the season.
We're not looking to replace it with a "marquee attraction"; we just need capacity.
Thanks, Paula
Paula Werne
Holiday World
Bill, why are you looking in Paula's mouth at her teeth?
I know a Zipper is probably the wrong 'fit' for Holiday World but would one fit in the location?
So. What would draw people in but still have high throughout?
What about a large Ferris Wheel? The ones at IB, KK and CP seem to push a long line through pretty quickly.
What about a really nice Carousel? It might appeal to families, and the ones at KW and CP can push large crowds through fast.
What about one of the circle rides? A Musik Express, or Himalayan, etc ? They seem pretty popular and push large crowds through fast.
One of the problems is that spot isn't big enough for many of the more spectacular rides. I don't think a Disco would fit.
I couldn't hardly believe it after reading this site:http://absolutelyreliable.com/2004_08_29_rumorarchive.html#109388642114714598)
Nicotine Patches....
That definitely would keep some of those lurkers off the pavement that disobey the signs, but, if someone is use to a cigarrette, I'm afraid they may not want to use the patch.
I've also heard rumors that there are some complications if someone has a patch on and decide to go sit and take a smoke in the designated smoking areas.. something like twice the nicotine. *** Edited 9/3/2004 4:00:12 AM UTC by spraker@yahoo.com***
bill, obviously trying to get the byline, someday...not satisfied with my fifteen minutes as "The Guy Near Hulk"...;)
You still have Zoidberg.... You ALL have Zoidberg! (V) (;,,;) (V)
IM not sure what the future holds for HW. I know Will and the gang will do everything they can to make it more enjoyable but on some recent visits the un-enjoyable part has be directly from the parks success and is no fault of thier own. (Crowds)
Theres a fine line between profitablility and being succesfull. HW needs to expand. Perhaps add a Splashing Safari parking area and entrance. I can easily see a new coaster, Even a steel looper or mine train and several other rides added as well as more waterpark improvements and additions. The question is, How to do it? How quickly to grow and still be profitable in the process.
I think they have the right man for the job. Honestly I don't think hes made a wrong move yet other than perhaps underestamating the success of his actions and that isn't neccessaraly a bad thing :)
You go HW!
Chuck
You must be logged in to post