I compare it to season tickets to a sports team. People don't question how much that costs, but get all bent out of shape over a slight increase in a season pass to an amusement park, which I think gives you SO MUCH MORE for your money since you can watch sports on TV, but you can't really do an amusement park that way...maybe RCT. ;)
Long live the Big Bad Wolf
Only a select few, 60 thousand of a area of 2 million will pay that much for a sports team. In the case of a amusement park, You want the 18 year old to be able to afford it and the head of household for a family of four.
And regardless, for me, $250 is still a steal for what I get out of it.
Long live the Big Bad Wolf
It's kinda what I was alluding to earlier. If one-off parks like HP and HW can command $120 or $130 for a pass..then there's no reason a chain-wide pass shouldn't be in the range you're suggesting. (with a cheaper $120-$130 pass good for just the local park as well)
I would rather pay like $300, get free pop and better service, than a cheap entry fee.
And I can (I know I'm beating a dead horse) totally do without the acting-out, gay-joke-cracking, 'suddenly cool' band tee shirt wearing, humping, making out teens, that most of the parks seem to love to babysit.
I love a great deal and take full advantage of the cheap passes, but I wouldn't mind paying that much if I planned to use the pass upwards of ten times.
I'm really starting to think the answer is to control how many times the pass can be used and price it based on that. There are the locals who use them 15-20+ times per year, the people who get them just becase it's going to be cheaper than paying three days admission and then there are the people who use them to get into LOTS of parks for the price of a couple of days at one park. $250 is a fair deal for me using the pass less than ten times in a season, but would obviously not be good for the "three times" people, and then there's the "20+" people.
Until the prices do reach $250, I'm not really concerned about rising costs. I won't get one if it's ging to cost me more than the total amount of individual visits I plan on making. Now the single day admission cost is a whole other story. ;)
Long live the Big Bad Wolf
Chuck, who considers that kinda money to be a much longer lasting investment than one season. Towards a lounge chair, car payment ect.
Another season pass that is pretty high is Morey's Piers. I looked on their site, and they don't have 2008 pricing on there yet. I think you can get your money's worth if you live close and use it enough.
Also a bargain for a season pass is free.
Bolliger/Mabillard for President in '08 NOT Dinn/Summers
Free covered parking. 10%-20% discounts on food and shopping. Two parks that are a five minute walk apart.
And if the value isn't obvious, consider that at 365 operating days a year that the season is three times longer than most seasonal parks.
As for season pass pricing, a lot of it is simply a matter of how badly the park wants to court the local, repeat business. It may like an obvious wish, but didn't Disneyland can annual passes for awhile a few years back?
There are also those Season passes that are pretty high pricing. Of course Disney World is the one that immediately comes to mind. Florida residents get a deal. What are the prices for Florida residents?
I pay $350 for my WDW annual pass. That's good for 365 days from the first date of use. If you want the water parks included, it is $459. You can get a cheaper non-water park pass for $230, but it is not valid during peak holiday times.
The best part about the pass is huge discounts on resorts. Basically, if you go to Disney for two weeks, it makes the most sense to get an annual pass - FL resident or not. I know my family is coming to visit at Christmas and then again in October of next year. So, they are getting annual passes since it is cheaper. Also, they'll get some great discounts on the resorts.
Also Six Flags offers the upgrade your Regular ticket to a season pass offer, which I know makes them lots of money as well.
For Prices, I believe some parks season passes are cheaper then others because of the size of the park and also base on how many season passes they sell in a season and how many times does a season pass holder visit the park each season. I think that parks like SFGAM have higher prices because season pass holders visit more often then other parks.
Rob Ascough said:
There's no way a season pass should go for anything less than three day's admission to the park where it can be purchased.
The problem with that theory is that the statistic is that people on average visit the park 3-4 times a year that have a season pass. If you are charging $180 in full price regards, how many people are going to buy it than? Also, you have to remember that people don't usually pay full price for one day at the park.
At my park, they had discounts at a place for $20 the regular price. These people are only paying $30 to get in. Thus, three visits is only $90, and not $180.
You wonder how Disney can get all these people keep on coming back. Some people who go to Disney go there for an entire week. I'm talking about the World one. There is a whole lot of stuff to do at Disney because lines are long, shows are long, and so on. There are also 4 parks. People keep on coming back over and over again. The Carousel of Progress and the Country Bears are probably 20 + minutes each alone. Thus, Disney can charge those high season pass prices, and get away with it.
Coasterfantom2 said:Another season pass that is pretty high is Morey's Piers. I looked on their site, and they don't have 2008 pricing on there yet. I think you can get your money's worth if you live close and use it enough.
I think it was in the $350 range and around $300 if you bought it early for 2007 (this was for 25 and under, 26 and over was slightly less). With the discounts and deals available, you have to visit 8+ times for the pass to pay for itself. Even if I lived 5 minutes away from the park, I don't think I would be willing to pay that much, with no real standout coasters (I think it's a nice park especially for a sea shore park but I'd rather pay under $100 for a SP to a full size park).
I'd rather pay under $100 for a SP to a full size park
I'd rather pay $0 for a pass that gets me into every park...
...but that's not going to happen.
I have enjoyed my Six Flags season pass for Six Flags St. Louis. Wish I would have used it more than just twice at St. Louis and once at KK, but it has paid off. I have heard that if you renew the parking part is only 25 dollars. Dont' know for sure, but will find out because I will be renewing hopefully by months end when I take a final trip to St. Louis to go even on parking pass costs. Next year I plan to go to Chicago on top of St. Louis (more than once, I get this feeling that once I ride a GCI, I will want to go every chance I get). I don't plan on heading back to KK any time soon unless I go for deluge. The coasters at KK are okay, but nothing to go back for.
If you live in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvaniathe CF Platinum Pass is a fabulous deal. I'm not thrilled with it, living where I do in Minnesota.
When I compare it to PCW's single-park pass--which includes many more coasters, a much larger waterpark, a far more beautiful environment and a new B&M hyper--for the same price, I really feel shortchanged.
Then again, I pay almost as much for a pass to a single wavepool ($65) as I will for a VF pass ($80), and another $25 for a parking pass without a moment's hesitation. Why? It's the price I'll pay to do what I really like. That's why.
If VF added nothing more than a wavepool, the $140 Platinum Pass price would fall out of my pocket in a heartbeat, my park visits would double and Da Babies' would triple at the minimum. But that's due to our own perception of value. Your mileage may vary.
*** Edited 10/2/2007 1:46:39 PM UTC by CoastaPlaya***
NOTE: Severe fecal impaction may render the above words highly debatable.
You must be logged in to post