As for clones, I agree, the 3 biggest Arrow megaloopers are extremely unimaginative, especially given the unchanging size of the various elements. It's as if they tried to cram in all 7 inversions with as little track in between as possible.
That said, the two of the three I've ridden I remember as being quite fun (Viper, Shockwave) but not as good as earlier Arrow loopers that were closer to being unique (Vortex, Loch Ness Monster). In fact, those two rides are still refreshing because the first hill doesn't go directly into a loop, like most Arrows and B&Ms (heck, 95% of looping coasters in general).
-----------------
You can't spell "dishonorable" without "honorable."
*** This post was edited by mamba on 12/12/2001. ***
DWeaver said:
"You wanna see unimaginative? Check out Stealth/Xfilght/Batwing. Viper was a monster in it's day, most people could care less what the layout was. It was tall, fast and scary. What more did you need?
Not sure.
This summer at SFMM I asked EVERYONE I was inline next to what there favorite ride was.
The result?:
Well, B:TR 2nd, and the unimaginative VIPER (#1) were the comments I heard. My family hit Viper several times and loved it.
I have to guess "Coasteraddict " was NOT the one to imagine it? (I don't see that name on it.)
Sprig
*** This post was edited by Sprig on 12/12/2001. ***
coasteraddict said:
" The only reason I brought this topic up was because I am sick of Viper always being on t.v. etc. They always show Magic Mountain and Cedar Point!!!(I have nothing against these parks obviously, because we all love roller coasters) But Why not show some other parks???
Sorry, didn't know that was your question.
The answer:
Because it costs more money to relocate a film crew the futher the film crew relocates.
SFMM isn't well known to the population of the whole USoA, and isn't very farm from major production studios.
It simply costs less to film closer to production location. IF Ohio were a major location for film production I am sure the thread would be reversed. It isn't, so get over it.
Sprig
Wow tough crowd to please for something that was built 12 years ago, wasn't it 1990 when viper was built. Also just b/c it was built in the 90's it could of been in the planning stages way back in 87/88/89, b/c they didn't have all the high tech computer stuff they do today. So it took way longer to plan design a ride then it does today.
-----------------
Wir schrauben für Euch die Achterbahn zusammen!!!
Magnum IS imaginative, because nothing of its scope had ever been done before. Also, the turnaround, the twisting second hill, etc., are all new.
Arrow can do imaginitive. Check out Tennessee Tornado. But I don't think anyone should be offended when it's said that Viper isn't imaginitive. It clearly isn't. That doesn't mean it's not fun.
-----------------
You can't spell "dishonorable" without "honorable."
*** This post was edited by DWeaver on 12/12/2001. ***
(/sarcasm)
-----------------
Kicking screamin' Gucci little siggy.
Oh yeah and Shockwave was the tallest coaster in the world until Maggie came around.
*** This post was edited by MagnumForce on 12/12/2001. ***
You must be logged in to post