On Drachen Fire, Arrow didn't refer to the element as a cobra roll, although the exact name they used escapes me. I want to say they called it a batwing.
When was the first B&M with a cobra roll? I know that their first Inverted with a cobra roll was Raptor, but I do not know how many non-inverted coasters they built before that with cobra rolls. I think Kumba was their first sit-down rollercoaster, and Drachen Fire predated Kumba by a year or two.
Arrow built numerous coastrers with batwings/kamikaze curves/boomerangs, which are essentially upside-down or inside-out cobra rolls.
Cameraman said:
I thought the "Drachen Fire was designed by B&M" rumor was disproved a long time ago? I even remember a formal letter from B&M that specifically stated that they had no involvement with Drachen Fire posted by someone who inquired B&M with a few questions.
Yes, because B&M would really openly acknowledge they had a part in such a disaster of a ride. Honestly, use some common sense.
-Nate
IT NEVER HAPPENED.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Its common knowledge that Vekoma used some Arrow Tech. in their rides, their sitdowns and suspendeds. I suppose they took some of those ideas, expanded on them, and came up with some of their own stuff. Personally, I like both Vekoma and Arrow coasters, not all are totally bad.
Carolina Cyclone is a great coaster. For a while, it started to get rough, but, as Gator likes to point out, the wood was running great this year, and the Steel @ Carowinds was running like hot butter on a plate. I couldn't tell a difference between Vortex(B&M), and Carolina Cyclone(Arrow). Even Runaway Reptar(Vekoma) felt like the other two, though none compared to Top Gun, my fav. inverted coaster, hands down.
Which, to me, says that there can be some good to come out of Arrow's early stuff.
But what do I know, I liked Shockwave...
The business arrangements with Huss and S&S were/are not partnerships. In the first case Huss had controlling interest in the Arrow company and all of its intellectual property, in the second it was bought outright.
Adam
Vater said:
I thought Ninja was actually designed by Vekoma, and just used Arrow trains. Maybe I'm just assuming here, but it seems odd to me that Kamikaze (Ninja's original name)--built in '89--has no straight sections of track from the top of the lift to the brakes, yet some of Arrow's later designs do, such as Anaconda ('91) and Drachen Fire ('92). The only exception to this that I can think of is SFStL's Ninja, which looks like it has more Arrow-like transitions than it's sibling in Georgia. So that could conceivably blow my theory to pieces, but I'll still stand by it, because I'm stubborn like that.But still, SFoG's Ninja, if it was solely designed by Vekoma, would explain the similarities between it and the modern SLC. *** Edited 12/1/2003 7:36:26 PM UTC by Vater***
I didn't clip anything from the quote because I think it is all worthy of being noted.
If you take a look at Kamikaze/Ninja and then a look at Parc Asterix's Goudurix, you'll see a lot of similarities in the first half of both rides, especially in the transitions between the loops. Given that, I would say that Ninja is a Vekoma-only design. The Ninja at SFStL, on the other hand, was an Arrow/Vekoma venture and is credited to both companies.
Kamikaze/Ninja also does bear many similarities to Vekoma's SLC- whether that's a coincidence or not is another story altogether.
-Nate
-Nate
You must be logged in to post