Looks smaller than on Xcellerator but maybe that's because it doesn't requier as much power...
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
Other prototypes such as their Tilt Coaster and Rock 'N Roller Coaster seem to be reliable, which happened to be the only ones I could think of. I also didn't realise that the Hammerhead hadn't been sold because it didn't work - from the videos I've seen it looked ready to go, so I'm surprised that it never left the factory.
In defense of Vekoma it should be said that most of their products are pretty reliable. Except for occasional closed seats on their SLCs and the stalling Boomerangs, their junior and custom mine-train coasters are solid performing rides.
Do we really have any information about the reliability of the TiltCoaster? Apart from some pictures and one or two videos I have never heard anything about it.
You are right about the Flyers. As with the Invertigo it had to be drastically changed. The seats were planned to tilt on the lift. Maybe this was a bit too ambitious and would have cost a lot extra. Maybe it was as well a security aspect.
The Hammerhead, well I see it as the actual prototype, or test for the GIB. They tried the catchcar on a vertical spike on this one.
We can just guess that the ride had problems and issues which made it a tough sell:
High maintenance, low capacity. Quite unspectacular ride, rendered obsolete by Intamins HalfPipe.
The BoosterBike at Toverland is actually a showroom piece for Vekoma. The park got it practically for free (there were some juristical problems recently which led to a delayed opening).
I think with Vekomas new owners (off-shore sea building) they will have access to reliable hydraulics. Add to this the new track and obviously heartlined transitions, it could be an intersting ride.
The ride is capabale of multiple train use, but it was not needed for a small park such as Toverland.
You must be logged in to post