In an effort to make up for their mistakes Arrow offered to build them another coaster at a big disount. KI chose a multi-looper patterned after the Orient Express. They got Vortex for only four milliobn dollars!
Prowler. Opens May,2 2009.
That's an extremely short explanation, but I believe sums it up.
http://www.extremepki.com/historyphotos/thumbnails.php?album=2
This was the first suspended coaster right? And all of them since have featured banking?
I don't care how new the technology is, it's pretty silly to think you wouldn't have to bank the track.
Those pictures are really cool - I've never seen them before. It looks like a sizeable coaster (much more to it than Top Gun).
Arrow perfected the design and when the built Big Bad Wolf, it had properly banked track, and it still runs today.
That was pretty dumb, but hey, it was the first one...
Coasterbuzzer said:
As stated before, there wasn't any banking for the turns. It was believed that the shocks would handle the pressure of the turns. Turns out they were wrong and the shocks were wearing out constantly. No one died or was injured on the Bat.
The Bat was originally designed without the shocks. The shocks were actually added incrementally after the ride had been installed and run to reduce the swing. My understanding is that Arrow thought the swinging motion would kill a good portion of the momentum.
The bit about the shocks is straight from the engineer at PKI who installed them, so that part I'm sure of.
- DJ
"When the end of the world comes, I want to be in Cincinnati because it's always twenty years behind the times." - Mark Twain
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Scroll down to the "Arrow Suspended Coaster Prototype Video" link and download it. The video shows a prototype suspended coaster that Arrow built (I'm assuming at their old plant) with no shocks and no banking. It also shows a working suspended coaster model with a corkscrew in it, showing that at least someone at Arrow wanted their suspended coasters to invert.
Really interesting video, really wrong-headed designing.
Jeff said:
Not banking the track was a stupid enough move, but what really struck me as silly was that they were braking the ride from under the tub instead of on the bogey. Seems to me that not braking from the heaviest spot on the car would involve common sense.
That always puzzled me as well. It's not like that was a design oversight, it was just plain dumb.
BBSpeed26 said:
Rare Roller Coaster ResourcesReally interesting video, really wrong-headed designing.
I found the same video clip with sound on You Tube.
It's interesting to hear them talk about it and adds a lot to the clip.
You must be logged in to post