The first-generation shuttles from Schwarzkopf that utilized drop weights to launch the train, such as those that operated as Tidal Wave at both Great America parks, were operated in such a manner that trains rarely used the rear spike. Rather they were braked on the return through the station.
On later fly-wheel launched models such as Montezooma and SFAW's G-Lightning trains were not braked on the return run and were allowed to negotiate the rear spike.
I've heard lots of speculation but I don't recall ever hearing why there is a difference. Can anyone give a factual explanation as to *why* those models are operated so differently? Was the braking system redesigned in the newer model?
Moosh
------------------
Don't believe everything you think. - bumper sticker seen on 4/19/03
*** This post was edited by Mamoosh 4/22/2003 11:28:07 AM ***
------------------
"It's not a Too-mah!" - Arnold after riding Batman the Ride
Seems to me the unbraked train would result in a shorter cycle.
------------------
Don't believe everything you think. - bumper sticker seen on 4/19/03
I think the more you use the brakes, the quicker those parts wear out. So if they could get away with it...but why couldn't they get away with it with the counter weight versions... hmmmmm
Sorry... ;)
------------------
"It's not a Too-mah!" - Arnold after riding Batman the Ride
But when Tidal Wave was at SFGAm it was braked a little on the backwards run but still went up 2/3 of the back spike.
BTW, I saw an E-stop once at the Viperthon in 2001... basically, you're screwed if you fell on the tracks and couldn't get out of the way. The train came into the brakes (backwards--return trip) and stopped with half the train in the back half of the station, and half the train out behind it.
------------------
Is that a Q-bot in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?
------------------
Don't believe everything you think. - bumper sticker seen on 4/19/03
Same with White Lightnin' at PCar.
------------------
Is it the real yellow or the yellow that they had on the coaster cars??
I rode King Kobra, but that was SO long ago (and I was SO scared, hehe), that I couldn't tell you anything about it, except it went upside-down...oh, and I didn't fall out...;)
------------------
"Brian, there's a message in my AlphaBits, it says 'ooooooo'"
"Peter, those are Cheerios"....Family Guy is BACK!!!
------------------
-Vater
Have you ridden a Toboggan?
Maybe as these weight drop shuttle loopers got older, the brakes have been applied harder but I cant really confirm that.
Bottomline: when Tidal Wave was in its early years, the back spike(especially if you sat toward the rear of the train) got some good back spike momentum.
------------------
Arena football has arrived in the Windy City. Go "Chicago Rush"
http://www.rcdb.com/installationgallery637.htm?Picture=3
Granted, that pic was taken 2 years before I rode it for the first time.
------------------
-Vater
Have you ridden a Toboggan?
*** This post was edited by Vater 4/22/2003 1:38:08 PM ***
!!! Only a guess, but I think Schwarzkopf rode the first REAL assembled ride himself in the back of the train and figured out how much more fun it would be for ALL the riders if they got the same sensation of speed and height as the front passengers!!!
Stopping the train on the return trip removes the height and speed for the riders seated at the rear of the train.
Monte is INCREDIBLE into the loop while in the front seat. I'm not to sure Xcellerator match's it. Some day I will find out. For comparison, S:TE does NOT match Monte's launch intensity in my book.
Monte is a great ride in both the front and the back. "I" prefer the front, as I like the G's into to loop, BUT! the height at the back of the train, and being able to see the park, is also a very neat experience.
Question then! Is there a current shuttle loop, where the riders can VEIW the park as well as if they were seated in the back? Do Boomerangs offer the same experience on the lift?
For some reason, I didn't think the Boomerang on the lift was as exciting as Monte on the back spike. "My" oipinion.
Interesting.
Sprig
Sprig said:Question then! Is there a current shuttle loop, where the riders can VEIW the park as well as if they were seated in the back? Do Boomerangs offer the same experience on the lift?
SFWoA's Mind Eraser, in the back, gives a great view of the park as it slowly lifts backwards.
I have ridden both Schwarzkopf shuttles and found Monte to be far superior to PGA's former Greezed Lightning. I felt the braking prior to entering the station backwards at PGA sort of took away from the ride while Monte just flew up the back spike.
Does this mean the new Greezed Lightning at SFKK will brake before entering the station as it is a weight drop?
X Factor
------------------
-Vater
Have you ridden a Toboggan?
As I understand it about Monte (still love that name!) the reason it's not braked is because the key that is needed to change the ride program was lost a while back. [Source: RideMan or another dependable guru, a short time ago]
------------------
- John
------------------
Don't believe everything you think. - bumper sticker seen on 4/19/03
You must be logged in to post